Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Docs] Correct example for prefer-exact-props rule #3510

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2022

Conversation

smackfu
Copy link
Contributor

@smackfu smackfu commented Dec 19, 2022

Fixes #3509

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3510 (415635f) into master (8b51eef) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3510   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.57%   97.57%           
=======================================
  Files         130      130           
  Lines        9213     9213           
  Branches     3342     3342           
=======================================
  Hits         8990     8990           
  Misses        223      223           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@ljharb ljharb force-pushed the fix-prefer-exact-props-docs branch from ce52a57 to 415635f Compare December 19, 2022 20:08
@ljharb ljharb merged commit 415635f into jsx-eslint:master Dec 19, 2022
Copy link

@Dubbeditt Dubbeditt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Error in docs for prefer-exact-props
3 participants