Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

arm64 docker image #226

Open
cyclinder opened this issue May 22, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #227 or #324
Open

arm64 docker image #226

cyclinder opened this issue May 22, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #227 or #324

Comments

@cyclinder
Copy link

Hi teams!

Is there an official arm64 image? Thanks

@cyclinder cyclinder linked a pull request May 23, 2022 that will close this issue
@jonkerj
Copy link
Contributor

jonkerj commented Apr 11, 2023

I saw there is a dockerfile for ARM64, albeit a separate one. I think the project would benefit from multiarch images, which is not that hard to do.

I'm willing to write a PR for this, but to be frank: the lack on feedback on issues/PRs in this project is not encouraging me. If the devs like this approach and are willing to review such a PR, please let me know.

@maiqueb
Copy link
Collaborator

maiqueb commented Apr 17, 2023

I think we would be interested in providing an arm64 img.

@jonkerj you can work on it if you want.

jonkerj added a commit to equinix-ms/whereabouts that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
This commit alters the Dockerfile for both regular and OpenShift in such
a way multiarch images are getting built when using buildkit. Also, the
GH workflow actually building the images is prepared for that.

Fixes k8snetworkplumbingwg#226

Signed-off-by: Jorik Jonker <[email protected]>
jonkerj added a commit to equinix-ms/whereabouts that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
This commit alters the Dockerfile for both regular and OpenShift in such
a way multiarch images are getting built when using buildkit. Also, the
GH workflow actually building the images is prepared for that.

Fixes k8snetworkplumbingwg#226

Signed-off-by: Jorik Jonker <[email protected]>
@jonkerj jonkerj linked a pull request Apr 18, 2023 that will close this issue
jonkerj added a commit to equinix-ms/whereabouts that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
This commit alters the Dockerfile for both regular and OpenShift in such
a way multiarch images are getting built when using buildkit. Also, the
GH workflow actually building the images is prepared for that.

Fixes k8snetworkplumbingwg#226

Signed-off-by: Jorik Jonker <[email protected]>
jonkerj added a commit to equinix-ms/whereabouts that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
This commit alters the Dockerfile for both regular and OpenShift in such
a way multiarch images are getting built when using buildkit. Also, the
GH workflow actually building the images is prepared for that.

Fixes k8snetworkplumbingwg#226

Signed-off-by: Jorik Jonker <[email protected]>
jonkerj added a commit to equinix-ms/whereabouts that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
This commit alters the Dockerfile for both regular and OpenShift in such
a way multiarch images are getting built when using buildkit. Also, the
GH workflow actually building the images is prepared for that.

Fixes k8snetworkplumbingwg#226

Signed-off-by: Jorik Jonker <[email protected]>
jonkerj added a commit to equinix-ms/whereabouts that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
This commit alters the Dockerfile for both regular and OpenShift in such
a way multiarch images are getting built when using buildkit. Also, the
GH workflow actually building the images is prepared for that.

Fixes k8snetworkplumbingwg#226

Signed-off-by: Jorik Jonker <[email protected]>
jonkerj added a commit to equinix-ms/whereabouts that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
This commit alters the Dockerfile for both regular and OpenShift in such
a way multiarch images are getting built when using buildkit. Also, the
GH workflow actually building the images is prepared for that.

Fixes k8snetworkplumbingwg#226

Signed-off-by: Jorik Jonker <[email protected]>
@jonkerj
Copy link
Contributor

jonkerj commented Apr 18, 2023

I've created PR #324, which I believe solves all this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants