Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update coverage requirement from ==5.3.* to >=5.3,<5.6 #15

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2021

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 13, 2021

Updates the requirements on coverage to permit the latest version.

Release notes

Sourced from coverage's releases.

coverage-5.5

  • coverage combine has a new option, --keep to keep the original data files after combining them. The default is still to delete the files after they have been combined. This was requested in issue 1108 and implemented in pull request 1110. Thanks, Éric Larivière.
  • When reporting missing branches in coverage report, branches aren’t reported that jump to missing lines. This adds to the long-standing behavior of not reporting branches from missing lines. Now branches are only reported if both the source and destination lines are executed. Closes both issue 1065 and issue 955.
  • Minor improvements to the HTML report:
    • The state of the line visibility selector buttons is saved in local storage so you don’t have to fiddle with them so often, fixing issue 1123.
    • It has a little more room for line numbers so that 4-digit numbers work well, fixing issue 1124.
  • Improved the error message when combining line and branch data, so that users will be more likely to understand what’s happening, closing issue 803.
Changelog

Sourced from coverage's changelog.

Version 5.5 --- 2021-02-28

  • coverage combine has a new option, --keep to keep the original data files after combining them. The default is still to delete the files after they have been combined. This was requested in issue 1108_ and implemented in pull request 1110_. Thanks, Éric Larivière.

  • When reporting missing branches in coverage report, branches aren't reported that jump to missing lines. This adds to the long-standing behavior of not reporting branches from missing lines. Now branches are only reported if both the source and destination lines are executed. Closes both issue 1065_ and issue 955_.

  • Minor improvements to the HTML report:

    • The state of the line visibility selector buttons is saved in local storage so you don't have to fiddle with them so often, fixing issue 1123_.

    • It has a little more room for line numbers so that 4-digit numbers work well, fixing issue 1124_.

  • Improved the error message when combining line and branch data, so that users will be more likely to understand what's happening, closing issue 803_.

.. _issue 803: nedbat/coveragepy#803 .. _issue 955: nedbat/coveragepy#955 .. _issue 1065: nedbat/coveragepy#1065 .. _issue 1108: nedbat/coveragepy#1108 .. _pull request 1110: nedbat/coveragepy#1110 .. _issue 1123: nedbat/coveragepy#1123 .. _issue 1124: nedbat/coveragepy#1124

.. _changes_54:

Version 5.4 --- 2021-01-24

  • The text report produced by coverage report now always outputs a TOTAL line, even if only one Python file is reported. This makes regex parsing of the output easier. Thanks, Judson Neer. This had been requested a number of times (issue 1086, issue 922, issue 732_).

  • The skip_covered and skip_empty settings in the configuration file can now be specified in the [html] section, so that text reports and HTML reports can use separate settings. The HTML report will still use the [report] settings if there isn't a value in the [html] section. Closes issue 1090_.

... (truncated)

Commits
  • f06b950 docs: use sphinxcontrib for the rst builder
  • 4432122 build: a better kit-building link
  • 9e8010c build: version 5.5 prep
  • c842085 doc: latest sample HTML report
  • 79087b9 fix: don't report branches to missing lines. #1065
  • b12f189 test: fix a few metacov exclusions
  • fd78a6d docs: correct the GitHub action badges
  • 1699725 fix: improve an error message. #803
  • 3f38567 build: coverage ci should fail fast
  • f5d6043 refactor: remove unused exception handling
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Mar 13, 2021
@kinow kinow merged commit 8da6d3f into master Mar 13, 2021
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/pip/coverage-gte-5.3-and-lt-5.6 branch March 13, 2021 22:04
kinow added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2021
@kinow kinow added this to the 0.8 milestone Mar 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant