Durable (non-shared) local storage management #121

smarterclayton · 2016-10-09T00:00:52Z

Feature Description

One-line feature description (can be used as a release note): Make locally attached (non-network attached) storage available as a persistent volume source.
Primary contact (assignee): @msau42 @vishh
Responsible SIGs: @kubernetes/sig-storage-feature-requests @kubernetes/sig-apps-feature-requests
Design proposal link (community repo): [Proposal] Improve Local Storage Management community#306
Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers (at least one from code-area OWNERS file) agreed to review. Reviewers from multiple companies preferred:
- @jsafrane
- @saad-ali
Approver (likely from SIG/area to which feature belongs):
- @thockin
Feature target (which target equals to which milestone):
- Alpha release target (x.y): 1.7/1.8
- Beta release target (x.y): 1.10
- Stable release target (x.y): 1.14

davidopp · 2016-10-09T21:58:38Z

I assume this is kubernetes/kubernetes#7562 ?

And that kubernetes/kubernetes#30044 is related?

smarterclayton · 2016-10-11T04:22:47Z

Yes and yes. Consensus is to see if we can pull together a design at most in 1.5

bprashanth · 2016-10-11T04:35:40Z

It would be great if we were ready to go at this in 1.6
@kubernetes/sig-storage @jingxu97

thockin · 2016-10-11T05:53:08Z

I think we can commit to that.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Prashanth B [email protected]
wrote:

It would be great if we were ready to go at this in 1.6
@kubernetes/sig-storage
https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes/teams/sig-storage @jingxu97
https://github.com/jingxu97

—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#121 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFVgVCoNyQWhL1_AAMD0eE1Uh79jaMWsks5qyxIggaJpZM4KR2_S
.

jingxu97 · 2016-10-11T16:28:30Z

Yes, I will definitely spend more time on this after this short release
cycle for 1.5. Thanks!

Jing

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Tim Hockin [email protected]
wrote:

I think we can commit to that.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Prashanth B [email protected]
wrote:

It would be great if we were ready to go at this in 1.6
@kubernetes/sig-storage
https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes/teams/sig-storage @jingxu97
https://github.com/jingxu97

—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/
121#issuecomment-252810762>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFVgVCoNyQWhL1_
AAMD0eE1Uh79jaMWsks5qyxIggaJpZM4KR2_S>
.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#121 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASSNxQlkIyJ98tTTTqNRkJh2JB3OtI-jks5qyyRJgaJpZM4KR2_S
.

Jing

vishh · 2017-01-18T22:57:15Z

@msau42 and myself will be tackling this problem in v1.6. The plan is as follows:

Design completion by v1.6
Alpha support for local storage by v1.7
Beta (or may be GA) by v1.8

@rkouj and @jingxu97 will also be helping with this effort.

@msau42 and @vishh will post a high level design proposal before end of Jan `17.

davidopp · 2017-01-24T20:04:32Z

Please loop me in on the scheduling aspects of this.

idvoretskyi · 2017-01-26T14:57:56Z

Misread the @vishh comment, let's target 1.7 when this milestone will be open.

wattsteve · 2017-01-27T13:07:33Z

@vishh and others. Given that we're already talking about targeting releases, is there a design proposal for this? FYI @saad-ali @childsb

vishh · 2017-01-27T19:59:28Z

Yeah. A design proposal will be made available anytime now.

…

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Steve Watt ***@***.***> wrote: @vishh <https://github.com/vishh> and others. Given that we're already talking about targeting releases, is there a design proposal for this? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#121 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGvIKLoIavf4pD5a8orh_CATy-s2gVi0ks5rWewXgaJpZM4KR2_S> .

krmayankk · 2017-01-29T18:31:39Z

@vishh has this anything to do with sticky empty dir proposal or local storage for statefulset ? I am getting confused which feature is doing what ? There are many things needed for local storage , e.g. 1: local storage support in statefulset 2: local storage volumes which is this one 3: pod should be scheduled in the same node where their data is already available 4: may be moving data to where the pod gets scheduled . It will be good to have one local storage featur which covers all related issues and proposals

vishh · 2017-01-29T21:48:33Z

@krmayankk the plan is to cover all supported use cases for local storage.

davidopp · 2017-01-29T21:54:09Z

@vishh I assume you are not including (4) from @krmayankk's comment? (migrating data between nodes)

msau42 · 2019-01-30T00:33:37Z

/assign @cofyc

spiffxp · 2019-02-07T16:20:52Z

Adding tracked label to reconcile against https://bit.ly/k8s114-enhancements
FYI @claurence @lachie83 @lledru @ameukam

jimangel · 2019-02-13T02:05:50Z

Hey @cofyc @msau42 👋 I'm the v1.14 docs release lead. Just a friendly reminder we're looking for a PR against k/website (branch dev-1.14) due by Friday, March 1. It would be great if it's the start of the full documentation, but even a placeholder PR is acceptable. Let me know if you have any questions!

liggitt · 2019-02-15T05:01:35Z

For 1.14 work, the following needs to be done:

Evaluate all usage of IsLikelyNotMountPoint(): kubernetes/kubernetes#72347

Add local PV to storage testsuites: kubernetes/kubernetes#71237

Move feature gate to GA

Doc updates

it doesn't sound like there are API changes involved in the 1.14 work. Is that accurate?

thockin · 2019-02-15T05:39:50Z

I think API was done long ago.

lledru · 2019-02-25T15:21:19Z

Hello, 1.14 enhancement shadow here. Code Freeze is March 7th and all PRs must be merged by then to your issue to make the 1.14 release. What open K/K PRs do you still have that need to merge? Thanks

msau42 · 2019-02-25T23:03:18Z

The items I listed above here tracks our 1.14 work.

kacole2 · 2019-04-12T19:14:57Z

Hello @msau42 @smarterclayton , I'm the Enhancement Lead for 1.15. Is this feature going to be graduating alpha/beta/stable stages in 1.15? Please let me know so it can be tracked properly and added to the spreadsheet. If this was included as GA in 1.14 lets close this issue.

Once coding begins, please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly.

/milestone clear

msau42 · 2019-04-12T20:20:52Z

1.14 was GA and any additional enhancements should be tracked as new features.
/close

k8s-ci-robot · 2019-04-12T20:20:53Z

@msau42: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

1.14 was GA and any additional enhancements should be tracked as new features.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

…our_own_vnet Azure: Customer provisioned virtual network & subnets enhancement doc

Automatic merge from submit-queue. Volume topology aware scheduling design Proposal for a smarter scheduler that influences PV binding. Part of kubernetes/enhancements#121 /sig storage /sig scheduling /cc @kubernetes/sig-storage-proposals @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-proposals

smarterclayton added sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. labels Oct 9, 2016

idvoretskyi modified the milestone: v1.5 Oct 11, 2016

idvoretskyi assigned smarterclayton Oct 13, 2016

idvoretskyi modified the milestones: next-milestone, v1.5 Oct 13, 2016

davidopp mentioned this issue Nov 7, 2016

Data awareness and Data/Pod affinity #139

Closed

23 tasks

vishh assigned vishh and msau42 and unassigned smarterclayton Jan 18, 2017

vishh changed the title ~~Local storage for use with PetSets and bare-metal clusters~~ Local storage Management (ephemeral & durable) Jan 18, 2017

msau42 mentioned this issue Jan 23, 2017

add support for host devices kubernetes/kubernetes#5607

Closed

idvoretskyi modified the milestones: v1.6, next-milestone Jan 26, 2017

k8s-ci-robot assigned cofyc Jan 30, 2019

saad-ali added stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status and removed stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status labels Jan 30, 2019

saad-ali added this to the v1.14 milestone Jan 30, 2019

liggitt added the kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API label Jan 31, 2019

spiffxp added tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Feb 7, 2019

liggitt removed the kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API label Feb 15, 2019

k8s-ci-robot removed this from the v1.14 milestone Apr 12, 2019

kacole2 added tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Apr 12, 2019

k8s-ci-robot closed this as completed Apr 12, 2019

kacole2 removed the tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team label Apr 12, 2019

ingvagabund pushed a commit to ingvagabund/enhancements that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2020

Merge pull request kubernetes#121 from jhixson74/master_azure_bring_y…

b0e0641

…our_own_vnet Azure: Customer provisioned virtual network & subnets enhancement doc

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Durable (non-shared) local storage management #121

Durable (non-shared) local storage management #121

smarterclayton commented Oct 9, 2016 •

edited by saad-ali

Loading

davidopp commented Oct 9, 2016 •

edited

Loading

smarterclayton commented Oct 11, 2016

bprashanth commented Oct 11, 2016

thockin commented Oct 11, 2016

jingxu97 commented Oct 11, 2016

vishh commented Jan 18, 2017

davidopp commented Jan 24, 2017

idvoretskyi commented Jan 26, 2017

wattsteve commented Jan 27, 2017 •

edited

Loading

vishh commented Jan 27, 2017 via email

krmayankk commented Jan 29, 2017

vishh commented Jan 29, 2017

davidopp commented Jan 29, 2017

msau42 commented Jan 30, 2019

spiffxp commented Feb 7, 2019

jimangel commented Feb 13, 2019

liggitt commented Feb 15, 2019

thockin commented Feb 15, 2019

lledru commented Feb 25, 2019

msau42 commented Feb 25, 2019

kacole2 commented Apr 12, 2019

msau42 commented Apr 12, 2019

k8s-ci-robot commented Apr 12, 2019

Durable (non-shared) local storage management #121

Durable (non-shared) local storage management #121

Comments

smarterclayton commented Oct 9, 2016 • edited by saad-ali Loading

Feature Description

davidopp commented Oct 9, 2016 • edited Loading

smarterclayton commented Oct 11, 2016

bprashanth commented Oct 11, 2016

thockin commented Oct 11, 2016

jingxu97 commented Oct 11, 2016

vishh commented Jan 18, 2017

davidopp commented Jan 24, 2017

idvoretskyi commented Jan 26, 2017

wattsteve commented Jan 27, 2017 • edited Loading

vishh commented Jan 27, 2017 via email

krmayankk commented Jan 29, 2017

vishh commented Jan 29, 2017

davidopp commented Jan 29, 2017

msau42 commented Jan 30, 2019

spiffxp commented Feb 7, 2019

jimangel commented Feb 13, 2019

liggitt commented Feb 15, 2019

thockin commented Feb 15, 2019

lledru commented Feb 25, 2019

msau42 commented Feb 25, 2019

kacole2 commented Apr 12, 2019

msau42 commented Apr 12, 2019

k8s-ci-robot commented Apr 12, 2019

smarterclayton commented Oct 9, 2016 •

edited by saad-ali

Loading

davidopp commented Oct 9, 2016 •

edited

Loading

wattsteve commented Jan 27, 2017 •

edited

Loading