Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sig-storage] Transfer VolumeSnapshots between namespaces #2848

Closed
4 tasks
Elbehery opened this issue Aug 2, 2021 · 13 comments
Closed
4 tasks

[sig-storage] Transfer VolumeSnapshots between namespaces #2848

Elbehery opened this issue Aug 2, 2021 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team
Milestone

Comments

@Elbehery
Copy link

Elbehery commented Aug 2, 2021

Enhancement Description

  • One-line enhancement description (can be used as a release note): Transfer VolumeSnapshots between namespaces
  • Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal:
  • Discussion Link:
  • Primary contact (assignee): @Elbehery
  • Responsible SIGs: sig-storage
  • Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Alpha release target (1.23):
    • Beta release target (x.y):
    • Stable release target (x.y):
  • Alpha
    • KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s):
    • Code (k/k) update PR(s):
    • Docs (k/website) update PR(s):

Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Aug 2, 2021
@Elbehery
Copy link
Author

Elbehery commented Aug 2, 2021

/sig storage
/assign @xing-yang

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 2, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 31, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 30, 2021
@jonyhy96
Copy link

jonyhy96 commented Dec 6, 2021

/cc

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label May 13, 2022
@xing-yang xing-yang reopened this May 13, 2022
@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

/milestone v1.25

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.25 milestone May 13, 2022
@xing-yang xing-yang assigned mkimuram and unassigned xing-yang May 18, 2022
@xing-yang xing-yang added the stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status label May 23, 2022
@jingxu97 jingxu97 moved this to Need Review in 1.25 Release May 25, 2022
@Priyankasaggu11929 Priyankasaggu11929 added tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Jun 3, 2022
@jasonbraganza
Copy link
Member

Hello @Elbehery, @mkimuram 👋, 1.25 Enhancements team here.

Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 18:00 PST on Thursday June 16, 2022.

For note, This enhancement is targeting for stage alpha for 1.25 (correct me, if otherwise)

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • KEP file using the latest template has been merged into the k/enhancements repo.
  • KEP status is marked as implementable
  • KEP has a updated detailed test plan section filled out
  • KEP has up to date graduation criteria
  • KEP has a production readiness review that has been completed and merged into k/enhancements.

Looks like for this one, we would need to update the following:

  • Update and get open PR Add proposal for transfer of VolumeSnapshot #2849 merged
    • Update the status field from provisional to implementable in the kep.yaml file and also reflect the latest target stage and milestone information
    • Update the KEP README.md file to add graduation criteria and a Test plan section as per the requirements listed in the updated detailed test plan section
    • Please update the open KEP PR to add a Production Readiness Review (PRR) for stage alpha

For note, the status of this enhancement is marked as at risk. Please keep the issue description up-to-date with appropriate stages as well. Thank you!

@Priyankasaggu11929
Copy link
Member

Priyankasaggu11929 commented Jun 11, 2022

Hello @Elbehery @mkimuram 👋 1.25 Enhancements Lead here!

Following up on discussion comment here #2849 (comment), could you please clarify if we're planning to close this issue in favor of moving ahead with KEP #3294? Thank you!

@jasonbraganza
Copy link
Member

Hello @Elbehery @mkimuram just checking if there any update on #2848 (comment)?
Thank you.

@mkimuram
Copy link
Contributor

/close

Closing in favor of #3294 .

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mkimuram: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/close

Closing in favor of #3294 .

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Repository owner moved this from Need Review to Done in 1.25 Release Jun 16, 2022
@rhockenbury rhockenbury added tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Sep 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants