Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow failed discovery on initial quota controller start #67784

Conversation

cheftako
Copy link
Member

Cherry pick of #67433 on release-1.9.

#67433: allow failed discovery on initial quota controller start

kube-controller-manager can now start the quota controller when discovery results can only be partially determined.

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Aug 23, 2018
@cheftako
Copy link
Member Author

/sig api-machinery

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. label Aug 23, 2018
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

This PR is not for the master branch but does not have the cherrypick-approved label. Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. label Aug 23, 2018
@cheftako
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @mbohlool

@cheftako
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce

@mbohlool
Copy link
Contributor

Can you add a release note to the original PR? Note you added in the first comment of this PR looks to be a good candidate: kube-controller-manager can now start the quota controller when discovery results can only be partially determined.

@mbohlool mbohlool added cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. labels Aug 28, 2018
@mbohlool
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for adding release notes. Approved for cherrypick.

@mbohlool mbohlool added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 30, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: cheftako

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mbohlool
Copy link
Contributor

Applying lgtm/approval from the base PR

@lavalamp lavalamp added this to the v1.9 milestone Aug 31, 2018
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 5b936a4 into kubernetes:release-1.9 Aug 31, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants