-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new DamerauLevenshtein... classes #84
Merged
orsinium
merged 6 commits into
life4:master
from
juliangilbey:split-damerau-levenshtein
Sep 18, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
742edf5
Add new DamerauLevenshteinRestricted and DamerauLevenshteinUnrestrict…
de1bb8e
Merge branch 'master' into split-damerau-levenshtein
orsinium 789893b
DamerauLevenshtein: make `restricted` a flag
orsinium 983e9c0
cleanup docstring
orsinium 47703b2
add OSA from rapidfuzz for DL
orsinium efd915c
clean-up DL a bit
orsinium File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this really correct? we write into
d[i, j]
which should be at mostd[len1-1, len2-1]
from my understanding.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't remember much about the algorithms, I can only rely on tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked the code. What a mess it is, oh my. We first set these values by doing iteration over
range(len(s1) + 1)
when initializing the matrix, And then when we do enumerationfor i, cs1 in enumerate(s1):
, we on the next line shift the index:i += 1
🧠 I'll try to clean it up a tiny bit.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is deliberate! The boundary values are needed, but are never modified later, as the algorithm looks at the preceding values in the array when calculating the new values. I tried to come up with a way of avoiding the i+=1 business, but I kept messing things up, so I decided to be somewhat non-Pythonic and stick to the algorithm as presented on Wikipedia!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip of the day:
enumerate
accepts an argumentstart
, where you can specify the initial value. I've changed the code to use it. It became a bit slower, for some reason, but IMHO a bit more readable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I completely missed the += 1 before
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, how neat! Thanks for that tip. I agree, more readable is better.