[libc++] Refactor tests for aligned allocation and sized deallocation #117915
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
llvmbot
added
the
libc++
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx Author: Louis Dionne (ldionne) ChangesThis patch refactors the tests around aligned allocation and sized deallocation to avoid relying on passing the -fsized-deallocation or -faligned-allocation flags by default. Since both of these features are enabled by default in >= C++14 mode, it now makes sense to make that assumption in the test suite. A notable exception is MinGW and some older compilers, where sized deallocation is still not enabled by default. We treat that as a "bug" in the test suite and we work around it by explicitly adding -fsized-deallocation, but only under those configurations. Patch is 26.19 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117915.diff 14 Files Affected:
diff --git a/libcxx/test/benchmarks/allocation.bench.cpp b/libcxx/test/benchmarks/allocation.bench.cpp
index 66a9b88793412b..4e69b5464798a9 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/benchmarks/allocation.bench.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/benchmarks/allocation.bench.cpp
@@ -6,8 +6,14 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// REQUIRES: -fsized-deallocation
-// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS: -fsized-deallocation
+// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11
+
+// These compiler versions and platforms don't enable sized deallocation by default.
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(clang-17): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(clang-18): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(apple-clang-16): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(target=x86_64-w64-windows-gnu): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(target=i686-w64-windows-gnu): -fsized-deallocation
#include "benchmark/benchmark.h"
diff --git a/libcxx/test/libcxx/language.support/support.dynamic/new_faligned_allocation.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/libcxx/language.support/support.dynamic/new_faligned_allocation.pass.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index 87f4783e12973e..00000000000000
--- a/libcxx/test/libcxx/language.support/support.dynamic/new_faligned_allocation.pass.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,108 +0,0 @@
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
-// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-// test libc++'s implementation of align_val_t, and the relevant new/delete
-// overloads in all dialects when -faligned-allocation is present.
-
-// Libc++ when built for z/OS doesn't contain the aligned allocation functions,
-// nor does the dynamic library shipped with z/OS.
-// XFAIL: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}
-
-// REQUIRES: -faligned-allocation
-// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS: -faligned-allocation
-
-#include <cassert>
-#include <new>
-#include <string>
-#include <type_traits>
-#include <typeinfo>
-
-#include "test_macros.h"
-
-static void test_allocations(std::size_t size, size_t alignment) {
- {
- void* ptr = ::operator new(size, std::align_val_t(alignment));
- assert(ptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(ptr) % alignment == 0);
- ::operator delete(ptr, std::align_val_t(alignment));
- }
- {
- void* ptr = ::operator new(size, std::align_val_t(alignment), std::nothrow);
- assert(ptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(ptr) % alignment == 0);
- ::operator delete(ptr, std::align_val_t(alignment), std::nothrow);
- }
- {
- void* ptr = ::operator new[](size, std::align_val_t(alignment));
- assert(ptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(ptr) % alignment == 0);
- ::operator delete[](ptr, std::align_val_t(alignment));
- }
- {
- void* ptr = ::operator new[](size, std::align_val_t(alignment), std::nothrow);
- assert(ptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(ptr) % alignment == 0);
- ::operator delete[](ptr, std::align_val_t(alignment), std::nothrow);
- }
-}
-
-int main(int, char**) {
- {
- static_assert(std::is_enum<std::align_val_t>::value, "");
- typedef std::underlying_type<std::align_val_t>::type UT;
- static_assert((std::is_same<UT, std::size_t>::value), "");
- }
- {
- static_assert((!std::is_constructible<std::align_val_t, std::size_t>::value), "");
-#if TEST_STD_VER >= 11
- static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::size_t, std::align_val_t>::value, "");
-#else
- static_assert((std::is_constructible<std::size_t, std::align_val_t>::value), "");
-#endif
- }
- {
- std::align_val_t a = std::align_val_t(0);
- std::align_val_t b = std::align_val_t(32);
- assert(a != b);
- assert(a == std::align_val_t(0));
- assert(b == std::align_val_t(32));
- }
- // First, check the basic case, a large allocation with alignment==size.
- test_allocations(64, 64);
- // Size being a multiple of alignment also needs to be supported.
- test_allocations(64, 32);
- // When aligned allocation is implemented using aligned_alloc,
- // that function requires a minimum alignment of sizeof(void*).
- // Check that we can also create overaligned allocations with
- // an alignment argument less than sizeof(void*).
- test_allocations(2, 2);
- // When implemented using the C11 aligned_alloc() function,
- // that requires that size be a multiple of alignment.
- // However, the C++ operator new has no such requirements.
- // Check that we can create an overaligned allocation that does
- // adhere to not have this constraint.
- test_allocations(1, 128);
- // Finally, test size > alignment, but with size not being
- // a multiple of alignment.
- test_allocations(65, 32);
-#ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_RTTI
- {
- // Check that libc++ doesn't define align_val_t in a versioning namespace.
- // And that it mangles the same in C++03 through C++17
-#ifdef _MSC_VER
- // MSVC uses a different C++ ABI with a different name mangling scheme.
- // The type id name doesn't seem to contain the mangled form at all.
- assert(typeid(std::align_val_t).name() == std::string("enum std::align_val_t"));
-#else
- assert(typeid(std::align_val_t).name() == std::string("St11align_val_t"));
-#endif
- }
-#endif
-
- return 0;
-}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/libcxx/memory/shared_ptr_array.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/libcxx/memory/shared_ptr_array.pass.cpp
index 772198304b415a..9ff148251a05f6 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/libcxx/memory/shared_ptr_array.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/libcxx/memory/shared_ptr_array.pass.cpp
@@ -8,8 +8,13 @@
//
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
-// REQUIRES: -fsized-deallocation
-// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS: -fsized-deallocation
+
+// These compiler versions and platforms don't enable sized deallocation by default.
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(clang-17): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(clang-18): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(apple-clang-16): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(target=x86_64-w64-windows-gnu): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(target=i686-w64-windows-gnu): -fsized-deallocation
// This test will fail with ASan if the implementation passes different sizes
// to corresponding allocation and deallocation functions.
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/align_val_t.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/align_val_t.pass.cpp
index 28c72f0be7aed8..b898b37ebc7e9d 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/align_val_t.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/align_val_t.pass.cpp
@@ -15,26 +15,50 @@
// XFAIL: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}
#include <new>
+#include <cassert>
+#include <cstddef>
+#include <string>
#include <type_traits>
+#include <typeinfo>
#include "test_macros.h"
-int main(int, char**) {
+constexpr bool test() {
+ static_assert(std::is_enum<std::align_val_t>::value, "");
+ static_assert(std::is_same<std::underlying_type<std::align_val_t>::type, std::size_t>::value, "");
+ static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::align_val_t, std::size_t>::value, "");
+ static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::size_t, std::align_val_t>::value, "");
+
{
- static_assert(std::is_enum<std::align_val_t>::value, "");
- static_assert(std::is_same<std::underlying_type<std::align_val_t>::type, std::size_t>::value, "");
- static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::align_val_t, std::size_t>::value, "");
- static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::size_t, std::align_val_t>::value, "");
+ auto a = std::align_val_t(0);
+ auto b = std::align_val_t(32);
+ auto c = std::align_val_t(-1);
+ assert(a != b);
+ assert(a == std::align_val_t(0));
+ assert(b == std::align_val_t(32));
+ assert(static_cast<std::size_t>(c) == static_cast<std::size_t>(-1));
}
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+int main(int, char**) {
+ test();
+ static_assert(test(), "");
+
+#if defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION) && !defined(TEST_HAS_NO_RTTI)
{
- constexpr auto a = std::align_val_t(0);
- constexpr auto b = std::align_val_t(32);
- constexpr auto c = std::align_val_t(-1);
- static_assert(a != b, "");
- static_assert(a == std::align_val_t(0), "");
- static_assert(b == std::align_val_t(32), "");
- static_assert(static_cast<std::size_t>(c) == (std::size_t)-1, "");
+ // Check that libc++ doesn't define align_val_t in a versioning namespace.
+ // And that it mangles the same in C++03 through C++17
+# ifdef _MSC_VER
+ // MSVC uses a different C++ ABI with a different name mangling scheme.
+ // The type id name doesn't seem to contain the mangled form at all.
+ assert(typeid(std::align_val_t).name() == std::string("enum std::align_val_t"));
+# else
+ assert(typeid(std::align_val_t).name() == std::string("St11align_val_t"));
+# endif
}
+#endif
return 0;
}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp
index dd8090aca5b285..c9b59ecaff396d 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp
@@ -34,13 +34,12 @@ void my_new_handler() {
}
int main(int, char**) {
- // Test that we can call the function directly
- {
- void* x = operator new[](10, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(64));
+ test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
+ void* x = operator new[](size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
assert(x != nullptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % 64 == 0);
- operator delete[](x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(64));
- }
+ assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
+ operator delete[](x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
+ });
// Test that the new handler is called if allocation fails
{
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
index 6ae8ceaf534e48..1bdae8d597f00f 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
@@ -34,13 +34,12 @@ void my_new_handler() {
}
int main(int, char**) {
- // Test that we can call the function directly
- {
- void* x = operator new[](10, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(64), std::nothrow);
+ test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
+ void* x = operator new[](size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
assert(x != nullptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % 64 == 0);
- operator delete[](x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(64), std::nothrow);
- }
+ assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
+ operator delete[](x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
+ });
// Test that the new handler is called and we return nullptr if allocation fails
{
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array_fsizeddeallocation.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array.pass.cpp
similarity index 68%
rename from libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array_fsizeddeallocation.pass.cpp
rename to libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array.pass.cpp
index 6077318278a1ba..a7991c8659f8d5 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array_fsizeddeallocation.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array.pass.cpp
@@ -6,15 +6,28 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// test sized operator delete[] replacement.
+// Test sized operator delete[] replacement.
-// Note that sized delete operator definitions below are simply ignored
-// when sized deallocation is not supported, e.g., prior to C++14.
+// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11
+
+// These compiler versions and platforms don't enable sized deallocation by default.
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(clang-17): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(clang-18): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(apple-clang-16): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(target=x86_64-w64-windows-gnu): -fsized-deallocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(target=i686-w64-windows-gnu): -fsized-deallocation
+
+// Android clang-r536225 identifies as clang-19.0 but it predates the real
+// LLVM 19.0.0, so it also leaves sized deallocation off by default.
+// UNSUPPORTED: android && clang-19.0
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete
-// REQUIRES: -fsized-deallocation
-// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS: -fsized-deallocation
+// Sized deallocation was introduced in LLVM 11
+// XFAIL: using-built-library-before-llvm-11
+
+// AIX, and z/OS default to -fno-sized-deallocation.
+// XFAIL: target={{.+}}-aix{{.*}}, target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}
#if !defined(__cpp_sized_deallocation)
# error __cpp_sized_deallocation should be defined
@@ -76,5 +89,5 @@ int main(int, char**)
assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
assert(1 == sized_delete_called);
- return 0;
+ return 0;
}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array14.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array14.pass.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index 52c4e3e0f69b69..00000000000000
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array14.pass.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
-// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-// test sized operator delete[] replacement.
-
-// These compiler versions don't enable sized deallocation by default.
-// UNSUPPORTED: clang-17, clang-18
-
-// Android clang-r536225 identifies as clang-19.0 but it predates the real
-// LLVM 19.0.0, so it also leaves sized deallocation off by default.
-// UNSUPPORTED: android && clang-19.0
-
-// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete, c++03, c++11
-// XFAIL: apple-clang
-// XFAIL: using-built-library-before-llvm-11
-
-// AIX, z/OS, and MinGW default to -fno-sized-deallocation.
-// XFAIL: target={{.+}}-aix{{.*}}, target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}, target={{.+}}-windows-gnu
-
-#include <new>
-#include <cstddef>
-#include <cstdlib>
-#include <cassert>
-
-#include "test_macros.h"
-
-int unsized_delete_called = 0;
-int unsized_delete_nothrow_called = 0;
-int sized_delete_called = 0;
-
-void operator delete[](void* p) TEST_NOEXCEPT
-{
- ++unsized_delete_called;
- std::free(p);
-}
-
-void operator delete[](void* p, const std::nothrow_t&) TEST_NOEXCEPT
-{
- ++unsized_delete_nothrow_called;
- std::free(p);
-}
-
-void operator delete[](void* p, std::size_t) TEST_NOEXCEPT
-{
- ++sized_delete_called;
- std::free(p);
-}
-
-// NOTE: Use a class with a non-trivial destructor as the test type in order
-// to ensure the correct overload is called.
-// C++14 5.3.5 [expr.delete]p10
-// - If the type is complete and if, for the second alternative (delete array)
-// only, the operand is a pointer to a class type with a non-trivial
-// destructor or a (possibly multi-dimensional) array thereof, the function
-// with two parameters is selected.
-// - Otherwise, it is unspecified which of the two deallocation functions is
-// selected.
-struct A { ~A() {} };
-
-int main(int, char**)
-{
- A* x = new A[3];
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_called);
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
- assert(0 == sized_delete_called);
-
- delete [] x;
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_called);
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
- assert(1 == sized_delete_called);
-
- return 0;
-}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp
index dbb10a76ad9e9b..5d321f08282b21 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp
@@ -34,13 +34,12 @@ void my_new_handler() {
}
int main(int, char**) {
- // Test that we can call the function directly
- {
- void* x = operator new(10, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(64));
+ test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
+ void* x = operator new(size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
assert(x != nullptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % 64 == 0);
- operator delete(x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(64));
- }
+ assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
+ operator delete(x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
+ });
// Test that the new handler is called if allocation fails
{
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
index b9d8ea2f4e4947..3e5ba574110fda 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
@@ -34,13 +34,12 @@ void my_new_handler() {
}
int main(int, char**) {
- // Test that we can call the function directly
- {
- void* x = operator new(10, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(64), std::nothrow);
+ test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
+ void* x = operator new(size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
assert(x != nullptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % 64 == 0);
- operator delete(x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(64), std::nothrow);
- }
+ assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
+ operator delete(x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
+ });
// Test that the new handler is called and we return nullptr if allocation fails
{
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete14.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete.pass.cpp
similarity index 63%
rename from libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete14.pass.cpp
rename to libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete.pass.cpp
index e00339761ec24c..85d014c07240d7 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete14.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete.pass.cpp
@@ -8,19 +8,34 @@
// Test sized operator delete replacement.
-// These compiler versions do not enable sized deallocation by default.
-// UNSUPPORTED: clang-17, clang-18
+// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11
+
+// These comp...
[truncated]
|
You can test this locally with the following command:git-clang-format --diff 02eaeec1ac61b3933bf10a40abdeff4e2958a4a5 2ac0fff67a590e17dde5a28cc4365245518a5bc0 --extensions h,cpp -- libcxx/test/benchmarks/allocation.bench.cpp libcxx/test/libcxx/memory/shared_ptr_array.pass.cpp libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/align_val_t.pass.cpp libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/types.h libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array.pass.cpp libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete.pass.cppView the diff from clang-format here.diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp
index c9b59ecaff..8045fca37b 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp
@@ -34,15 +34,15 @@ void my_new_handler() {
}
int main(int, char**) {
- test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
- void* x = operator new[](size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
- assert(x != nullptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
- operator delete[](x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
- });
+ test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
+ void* x = operator new[](size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
+ assert(x != nullptr);
+ assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
+ operator delete[](x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
+ });
- // Test that the new handler is called if allocation fails
- {
+ // Test that the new handler is called if allocation fails
+ {
#ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
std::set_new_handler(my_new_handler);
try {
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
index 1bdae8d597..7c410a8a55 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
@@ -34,20 +34,19 @@ void my_new_handler() {
}
int main(int, char**) {
- test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
- void* x = operator new[](size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
- assert(x != nullptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
- operator delete[](x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
- });
+ test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
+ void* x = operator new[](size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
+ assert(x != nullptr);
+ assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
+ operator delete[](x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
+ });
- // Test that the new handler is called and we return nullptr if allocation fails
- {
- std::set_new_handler(my_new_handler);
- void* x = operator new[](std::numeric_limits<std::size_t>::max(),
- static_cast<std::align_val_t>(32), std::nothrow);
- assert(new_handler_called == 1);
- assert(x == nullptr);
+ // Test that the new handler is called and we return nullptr if allocation fails
+ {
+ std::set_new_handler(my_new_handler);
+ void* x = operator new[](std::numeric_limits<std::size_t>::max(), static_cast<std::align_val_t>(32), std::nothrow);
+ assert(new_handler_called == 1);
+ assert(x == nullptr);
}
// Test that a new expression constructs the right object
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array.pass.cpp
index f0ad2c0e67..548b82e565 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array.pass.cpp
@@ -31,11 +31,11 @@
// XFAIL: target={{.+}}-aix{{.*}}, target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}
#if !defined(__cpp_sized_deallocation)
-# error __cpp_sized_deallocation should be defined
+# error __cpp_sized_deallocation should be defined
#endif
#if !(__cpp_sized_deallocation >= 201309L)
-# error expected __cpp_sized_deallocation >= 201309L
+# error expected __cpp_sized_deallocation >= 201309L
#endif
#include <new>
@@ -45,26 +45,23 @@
#include "test_macros.h"
-int unsized_delete_called = 0;
+int unsized_delete_called = 0;
int unsized_delete_nothrow_called = 0;
-int sized_delete_called = 0;
+int sized_delete_called = 0;
-void operator delete[](void* p) TEST_NOEXCEPT
-{
- ++unsized_delete_called;
- std::free(p);
+void operator delete[](void* p) TEST_NOEXCEPT {
+ ++unsized_delete_called;
+ std::free(p);
}
-void operator delete[](void* p, const std::nothrow_t&) TEST_NOEXCEPT
-{
- ++unsized_delete_nothrow_called;
- std::free(p);
+void operator delete[](void* p, const std::nothrow_t&) TEST_NOEXCEPT {
+ ++unsized_delete_nothrow_called;
+ std::free(p);
}
-void operator delete[](void* p, std::size_t) TEST_NOEXCEPT
-{
- ++sized_delete_called;
- std::free(p);
+void operator delete[](void* p, std::size_t) TEST_NOEXCEPT {
+ ++sized_delete_called;
+ std::free(p);
}
// NOTE: Use a class with a non-trivial destructor as the test type in order
@@ -76,19 +73,20 @@ void operator delete[](void* p, std::size_t) TEST_NOEXCEPT
// with two parameters is selected.
// - Otherwise, it is unspecified which of the two deallocation functions is
// selected.
-struct A { ~A() {} };
-
-int main(int, char**)
-{
- A* x = new A[3];
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_called);
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
- assert(0 == sized_delete_called);
-
- delete [] x;
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_called);
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
- assert(1 == sized_delete_called);
-
- return 0;
+struct A {
+ ~A() {}
+};
+
+int main(int, char**) {
+ A* x = new A[3];
+ assert(0 == unsized_delete_called);
+ assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
+ assert(0 == sized_delete_called);
+
+ delete[] x;
+ assert(0 == unsized_delete_called);
+ assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
+ assert(1 == sized_delete_called);
+
+ return 0;
}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp
index 5d321f0828..854f5b40eb 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp
@@ -34,15 +34,15 @@ void my_new_handler() {
}
int main(int, char**) {
- test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
- void* x = operator new(size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
- assert(x != nullptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
- operator delete(x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
- });
+ test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
+ void* x = operator new(size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
+ assert(x != nullptr);
+ assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
+ operator delete(x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment));
+ });
- // Test that the new handler is called if allocation fails
- {
+ // Test that the new handler is called if allocation fails
+ {
#ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
std::set_new_handler(my_new_handler);
try {
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
index 3e5ba57411..5cf193a614 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align_nothrow.pass.cpp
@@ -34,20 +34,19 @@ void my_new_handler() {
}
int main(int, char**) {
- test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
- void* x = operator new(size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
- assert(x != nullptr);
- assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
- operator delete(x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
- });
+ test_with_interesting_alignments([](std::size_t size, std::size_t alignment) {
+ void* x = operator new(size, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
+ assert(x != nullptr);
+ assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(x) % alignment == 0);
+ operator delete(x, static_cast<std::align_val_t>(alignment), std::nothrow);
+ });
- // Test that the new handler is called and we return nullptr if allocation fails
- {
- std::set_new_handler(my_new_handler);
- void* x = operator new(std::numeric_limits<std::size_t>::max(),
- static_cast<std::align_val_t>(32), std::nothrow);
- assert(new_handler_called == 1);
- assert(x == nullptr);
+ // Test that the new handler is called and we return nullptr if allocation fails
+ {
+ std::set_new_handler(my_new_handler);
+ void* x = operator new(std::numeric_limits<std::size_t>::max(), static_cast<std::align_val_t>(32), std::nothrow);
+ assert(new_handler_called == 1);
+ assert(x == nullptr);
}
// Test that a new expression constructs the right object
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete.pass.cpp
index fd52df451a..a4fb78a135 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete.pass.cpp
@@ -31,11 +31,11 @@
// XFAIL: target={{.+}}-aix{{.*}}, target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}
#if !defined(__cpp_sized_deallocation)
-# error __cpp_sized_deallocation should be defined
+# error __cpp_sized_deallocation should be defined
#endif
#if !(__cpp_sized_deallocation >= 201309L)
-# error expected __cpp_sized_deallocation >= 201309L
+# error expected __cpp_sized_deallocation >= 201309L
#endif
#include <new>
@@ -45,41 +45,37 @@
#include "test_macros.h"
-int unsized_delete_called = 0;
+int unsized_delete_called = 0;
int unsized_delete_nothrow_called = 0;
-int sized_delete_called = 0;
+int sized_delete_called = 0;
-void operator delete(void* p) TEST_NOEXCEPT
-{
- ++unsized_delete_called;
- std::free(p);
+void operator delete(void* p) TEST_NOEXCEPT {
+ ++unsized_delete_called;
+ std::free(p);
}
-void operator delete(void* p, const std::nothrow_t&) TEST_NOEXCEPT
-{
- ++unsized_delete_nothrow_called;
- std::free(p);
+void operator delete(void* p, const std::nothrow_t&) TEST_NOEXCEPT {
+ ++unsized_delete_nothrow_called;
+ std::free(p);
}
-void operator delete(void* p, std::size_t) TEST_NOEXCEPT
-{
- ++sized_delete_called;
- std::free(p);
+void operator delete(void* p, std::size_t) TEST_NOEXCEPT {
+ ++sized_delete_called;
+ std::free(p);
}
-int main(int, char**)
-{
- int *x = new int(42);
- DoNotOptimize(x);
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_called);
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
- assert(0 == sized_delete_called);
-
- delete x;
- DoNotOptimize(x);
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_called);
- assert(1 == sized_delete_called);
- assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
-
- return 0;
+int main(int, char**) {
+ int* x = new int(42);
+ DoNotOptimize(x);
+ assert(0 == unsized_delete_called);
+ assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
+ assert(0 == sized_delete_called);
+
+ delete x;
+ DoNotOptimize(x);
+ assert(0 == unsized_delete_called);
+ assert(1 == sized_delete_called);
+ assert(0 == unsized_delete_nothrow_called);
+
+ return 0;
}
|
This patch refactors the tests around aligned allocation and sized deallocation to avoid relying on passing the -fsized-deallocation or -faligned-allocation flags by default. Since both of these features are enabled by default in >= C++14 mode, it now makes sense to make that assumption in the test suite. A notable exception is MinGW and some older compilers, where sized deallocation is still not enabled by default. We treat that as a "bug" in the test suite and we work around it by explicitly adding -fsized-deallocation, but only under those configurations.
ldionne
force-pushed
the
review/fsized-deallocation
branch
from
3f86a7f to
2ac0fff
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This patch refactors the tests around aligned allocation and sized deallocation to avoid relying on passing the -fsized-deallocation or -faligned-allocation flags by default. Since both of these features are enabled by default in >= C++14 mode, it now makes sense to make that assumption in the test suite.
A notable exception is MinGW and some older compilers, where sized deallocation is still not enabled by default. We treat that as a "bug" in the test suite and we work around it by explicitly adding -fsized-deallocation, but only under those configurations.