Development: Update programming exercise docs for integrated code lifecycle
#9509
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/user/exercises/programming-exercise-setup.inc (2)
397-397: Correct the capitalization of 'OCaml'The programming language 'OCaml' should be correctly capitalized to maintain consistency.
Apply this diff:
-For example, for Java exercises, only the assignment repository path can be changed. For Ocaml exercises, the assignment, test, and solution repository paths can be changed. +For example, for Java exercises, only the assignment repository path can be changed. For OCaml exercises, the assignment, test, and solution repository paths can be changed.
399-399: Capitalize 'Docker' appropriately'Docker' is a proper noun and should be capitalized.
Apply this diff:
-For C programming exercises, if used with the default docker image, changing the checkout paths will lead to build errors. The default docker image is configured to work with the default checkout paths. +For C programming exercises, if used with the default Docker image, changing the checkout paths will lead to build errors. The default Docker image is configured to work with the default checkout paths.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
docs/user/exercises/programming/checkout-paths-edit.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/*.pngdocs/user/exercises/programming/checkout-paths-preview.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- docs/requirements.txt (1 hunks)
- docs/user/exercises/programming-exercise-setup.inc (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs/requirements.txt
🧰 Additional context used
BBesrour
changed the title
Development: Update programming exercise ICL docs
BBesrour
dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot], SimonEntholzer, and cremertim
via
3243465
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
docs/user/exercises/programming-exercise-setup.inc (5)
376-400: Approve new section with minor correctionThe new "Edit Repositories Checkout Paths" section provides valuable information about customizing repository checkout paths during exercise creation. It clearly explains the concept and includes important warnings about potential issues.
However, there's a minor syntax issue with the reStructuredText cross-reference directive on line 379.
Please apply this correction:
-**This option is only available when using** :ref:``integrated code lifecycle`` +**This option is only available when using** :ref:`integrated code lifecycle`
403-414: Approve new section with minor correctionThe new "Edit Maximum Build Duration" section provides useful information about adjusting the time limit for build plan execution. It clearly explains the concept and includes a visual aid (slider image) to help users understand the interface.
However, there's a minor syntax issue with the reStructuredText cross-reference directive on line 406, similar to the issue in the previous section.
Please apply this correction:
-**This option is only available when using** :ref:``integrated code lifecycle`` +**This option is only available when using** :ref:`integrated code lifecycle`
Line range hint
416-474: Approve updates with a minor suggestionThe expanded "Configure static code analysis" section provides excellent detailed information about static code analysis tools and their configuration. The new table clearly shows supported tools for different programming languages, which is very helpful for users.
The updates significantly improve the clarity and usefulness of this section.
For consistency, consider adding a brief explanation for the empty cells in the "Configuration File" column of the table, particularly for GCC and PMD Copy/Paste Detector (CPD). This would help users understand if these tools don't require configuration files or if the information is missing.
Line range hint
476-684: Approve updates with a minor suggestion for clarityThe expanded "Configure Grading" section provides comprehensive and detailed information about configuring grading for programming exercises. The new subsections for the Test Case Tab and Code Analysis Tab are particularly helpful in explaining the different aspects of grading configuration.
The explanations of grading options and their effects are clear and well-illustrated with examples. The inclusion of a video tutorial is also a great addition for visual learners.
To further improve clarity, consider adding a brief introductory paragraph at the beginning of the "Configure Grading" section that outlines the two main aspects of grading configuration (Test Cases and Code Analysis) before diving into the details. This would help users understand the overall structure of the grading configuration process.
Line range hint
686-726: Approve updates with a minor suggestion for consistencyThe updated "Verify the exercise configuration" section provides valuable information about verifying the exercise setup, including the new feature for comparing template and solution repositories. This addition is particularly useful for instructors to review the changes students are expected to make.
The explanation of the comparison feature and the included images are helpful in guiding users through the process.
For consistency with the rest of the document, consider adding a brief explanation of why comparing the template and solution repositories is important in the exercise verification process. This would help tie this new feature more closely to the overall goal of ensuring the exercise is correctly configured.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/user/exercises/programming/timeout-slider.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- docs/user/exercises/programming-exercise-setup.inc (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/user/exercises/programming-exercise-setup.inc (1)
Line range hint
1-726: Excellent updates to the programming exercise setup documentationThe changes made to this documentation file significantly improve its clarity, comprehensiveness, and usefulness. The new sections on editing repository checkout paths and maximum build duration, along with the expanded sections on static code analysis and grading configuration, provide valuable guidance for instructors setting up programming exercises.
The addition of visual aids, such as images and a video tutorial, enhances the user experience and makes the instructions easier to follow.
To ensure overall consistency and completeness, please run the following script to check for any remaining
:ref:directives that might need updating:If this script returns any results, please update those
:ref:directives to use single backticks instead of double backticks.✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Further Verification Needed
To ensure there are no incorrectly formatted
:ref:directives remaining, please run the following script:
All
:ref:Directives Are Correctly FormattedThe verification process confirmed that there are no incorrectly formatted
:ref:directives using improper backticks in theprogramming-exercise-setup.incdocumentation. The documentation adheres to the correct syntax and formatting standards.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potentially incorrect :ref: directives in the file rg --type rst ':ref:``' docs/user/exercises/programming-exercise-setup.incLength of output: 76
Script:
# Generated Script for Enhanced Verification #!/bin/bash # Description: Search for incorrect :ref: directives with improper backticks rg --type rst ':ref:`[^`]+``' docs/user/exercises/programming-exercise-setup.incLength of output: 82
krusche
deleted the
chore/development/update-programming-exercise-icl-docs
branch
krusche
changed the title
Development: Update programming exercise ICL docsDevelopment: Update programming exercise docs for integrated code lifecycle
Integrated code lifecycle: Provide Instructors more options to control container configuration
#9487
Checklist
General
Motivation and Context
Added a section about editing the checkout paths
Steps for Testing
Make sure that docs are correct and comprehensible
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Code Review
Test Coverage
Screenshots
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation