feat(icons): adds microchip icon

[karsa-mistmere]

What is the purpose of this pull request?

• New Icon

Description

We do not currently have an icon that could represent GPUs, this PR adds a microchip icon that could stand in for either GPUs or RAM.

Icon use case

• gpu
• ram
• microchip

Alternative icon designs

Icon Design Checklist

Concept

• I have provided valid use cases for each icon.
• I have not added any a brand or logo icon.
• I have not used any hate symbols.
• I have not included any religious or political imagery.

Author, credits & license

• I've based them on the following Lucide icons: cpu

Naming

• I've read and followed the naming conventions
• I've named icons by what they are rather than their use case.
• I've provided meta JSON files in icons/[iconName].json.

Design

• I've read and followed the icon design guidelines
• I've made sure that the icons look sharp on low DPI displays.
• I've made sure that the icons look consistent with the icon set in size, optical volume and density.
• I've made sure that the icons are visually centered.
• I've correctly optimized all icons to two points of precision.

Before Submitting

• I've read the Contribution Guidelines.
• I've checked if there was an existing PR that solves the same issue.

[github-actions]

Added or changed icons

Preview cohesion

Preview stroke widths

DPI Preview (24px)

Icon X-rays

Icons as code

Works for: lucide-react, lucide-react-native, lucide-preact, lucide-vue-next

const MicrochipIcon = createLucideIcon('Microchip', [
  ["path",{"d":"M18 12h2"}],
  ["path",{"d":"M18 16h2"}],
  ["path",{"d":"M18 20h2"}],
  ["path",{"d":"M18 4h2"}],
  ["path",{"d":"M18 8h2"}],
  ["path",{"d":"M4 12h2"}],
  ["path",{"d":"M4 16h2"}],
  ["path",{"d":"M4 20h2"}],
  ["path",{"d":"M4 4h2"}],
  ["path",{"d":"M4 8h2"}],
  ["path",{"d":"M8 2a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v16a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h8a2 2 0 0 0 2-2V4a2 2 0 0 0-2-2h-1.5c-.276 0-.494.227-.562.495a2 2 0 0 1-3.876 0C9.994 2.227 9.776 2 9.5 2z"}]
])

[jguddas]

Feels traffic lightly 🚦

[ericfennis]

Maybe first design is a better fit?

[github-actions]

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

[karsa-mistmere]

What do you think about this design?

[ericfennis]

@karsa-mistmere That will work. I think the right one will look the best on 100% scale with the tiny pins.

[jguddas]

All feel hard to identify.

[midnight-wonderer]

I like the top left one in the alternative designs.
For three reasons:

• The aspect ratio of the chip looks familiar. While the ratio itself IRL depends on pin count, I work with many ICs with similar ratios to that one.
• It has eight pins. While six pins are not unusual, eight are easier to come by.
• No weird line on top of the package. I don't know what that depicts.

PS.
Do you remember this guy?

Probably add a curve on top to depict marking similar to the real IC package.

[karsa-mistmere]

Some further variations:

[jguddas]

Do you have the studio link for the right most one 2nd row?

[karsa-mistmere]

Do you have the studio link for the right most one 2nd row?

I didn't but now I do:

Open lucide studio

[jguddas]

Open lucide studio

[ericfennis]

Hmm I'm more in for the first design. To keep it simple.
I know the notch is there in some chips in real life. But feels a bit weird to me to make it part of the design. I think the shape should be consistent with the CPU icon.

But it's my opinion if you all like this design I go with you.

[jguddas]

What about rotating it +90°?
Most icons that can be horizontal are horizontal after all?

[github-actions]

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.