Use superscript for scriptChild in msubsup. (mathjax/MathJax#3097) #999
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a problem with the placement of
msubsup
scripts when when the depth of either script is large. The problem was due to thegetU()
method usingthis.scriptChild
, wheresciptChild
was always set tochildNodes[1]
; formsubsup
nodes, it should bechildNodes[2]
, the superscript. The solution is to overridescriptChild
in theCommonMsubsupMixin
wrapper. (I also cached the superscript depth and subscript height values that are used in several places).The issue would show up if the superscript has large depth, as in
which produces
or if the subscript has large depth, as in
which produces
With this PR, both produce the proper results:
Resolves issue mathjax/MathJax#3097.