You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Naming is inconsistent and it leaves a large gap of performance between LongAlt and Medium.
Create two new intermediate configurations. Proposed:
Short Name
Long Name
bytes / sec
bits / sec
LongSlow
Long Range / Slow
Bw125Cr48Sf4096
12
17.09
136.71
LongFast
Long Range / Fast
Bw31_25Cr48Sf512
9
24.59
196.74
MediumSlow*
Medium Range / Slow
Bw250Cr46Sf2048
11
895*
MediumFast*
Medium Range / Fast
Bw250Cr47Sf1024
10
1400*
ShortSlow
Short Range / Slow
Bw125Cr45Sf128
7
600.00
4800.00
ShortFast
Short Range / Fast
Bw500Cr45Sf128
7
2418.37
19346.94
The channel names will renamed but the enum positions and values will remain the same for backward compatibility. Data rates are estimates and will be confirmed once implemented.
This will be generally required by the S&F plugin due to the bandwidth requirements to replay a few hundred messages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mc-hamster
added a commit
to mc-hamster/Meshtastic-device
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2021
We currently have:
Naming is inconsistent and it leaves a large gap of performance between LongAlt and Medium.
Create two new intermediate configurations. Proposed:
The channel names will renamed but the enum positions and values will remain the same for backward compatibility. Data rates are estimates and will be confirmed once implemented.
This will be generally required by the S&F plugin due to the bandwidth requirements to replay a few hundred messages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: