Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial Partial Updates on t-echo #3090

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 19, 2024

Conversation

ixt
Copy link
Contributor

@ixt ixt commented Jan 13, 2024

#3075

Partial Updates for t-echo, The boot screen is very faint. And we don't (to my knowledge) do a full refresh at some point to help with ghosting but this should be good for now. I can't believe it was basically working. I'll find some time to write something for full updates (maybe on manual loop of screens and after n-partial updates)

@markbirss
Copy link
Contributor

markbirss commented Jan 13, 2024

@ixt it currently normal for some e-inks to have faint boot screen

yes, a counter but it must goto the rtos tasks i think

I dont own a t-echo

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ GxEPD2_BW<TECHO_DISPLAY_MODEL, TECHO_DISPLAY_MODEL::HEIGHT> *adafruitDisplay;
EInkDisplay::EInkDisplay(uint8_t address, int sda, int scl, OLEDDISPLAY_GEOMETRY geometry, HW_I2C i2cBus)
{
#if defined(TTGO_T_ECHO)
setGeometry(GEOMETRY_RAWMODE, TECHO_DISPLAY_MODEL::WIDTH, TECHO_DISPLAY_MODEL::HEIGHT);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change necessary?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was looking at all the e-ink support as raised by the previous ESP32-S3-PICO PR. I wanted to look at supply these geometry values in the platformio.ini variant files which would reduce the checks so it ok for now

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was the change actually that made it all work for me (aside from the explicitly partial update parts). The why is an open question to me though

thebentern added a commit to meshtastic/artifacts that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
@thebentern thebentern merged commit 751bdf9 into meshtastic:master Jan 19, 2024
62 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants