New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Smarter traffic scaling #5264

Merged

thebentern merged 1 commit into master from smarter-traffic-scaling

Nov 6, 2024

Contributor

thebentern commented Nov 6, 2024

Closes #964

This PR addresses a few issues with the current mesh size based intervalled traffic management:

Smaller networks (backpacking, small towns, etc) of <= 40 are encouraged to transmit more frequently.
Sensors and trackers don't get telemetry / position throttled because these are crucial data points for their respective roles.
The coefficient for throttling back the interval has more judicious values for the faster presets now, so it's less of a one size fits all poorly approach.

thebentern requested a review from GUVWAF

November 6, 2024 12:00


          Smarter traffic scaling

0be6821

fifieldt force-pushed the smarter-traffic-scaling branch from fd37ac3 to 0be6821 Compare

November 6, 2024 13:04

GUVWAF approved these changes

View reviewed changes

Member

GUVWAF left a comment

Looks good!

thebentern merged commit 73e2e25 into master

48 checks passed

thebentern deleted the smarter-traffic-scaling branch

November 6, 2024 21:00

rcarteraz mentioned this pull request

[Documentation Change Request]: Updated Traffic Scaling meshtastic/meshtastic#1620

Open

1 task

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet