Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reduce the flash usage of wismeshtap platform #5322

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

DanielCao0
Copy link
Contributor

Reduce the flash usage of wismeshtap platform , If the flash usage is too high, the .uf2 cannot be used

@fifieldt fifieldt force-pushed the wismeshtap_reduce_flash branch from 2f40570 to 4a11437 Compare November 12, 2024 08:14
Copy link
Contributor

@fifieldt fifieldt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Range test is pretty popular in my local communities. Does it work if you keep it in?

@caveman99
Copy link
Member

How likely is it this target will include the wisblock ethernet port? i think that's a good chunk of code we can guard. I can add a define for it.

@DanielCao0
Copy link
Contributor Author

Range test is pretty popular in my local communities. Does it work if you keep it in?

Thanks for your advice. I've resumed the distance test. As long as the usage does not exceed 99%, the uf2 can run normally
RAM: [== ] 21.7% (used 53928 bytes from 248832 bytes)
Flash: [==========] 98.1% (used 799848 bytes from 815104 bytes)

@DanielCao0
Copy link
Contributor Author

DanielCao0 commented Nov 12, 2024

How likely is it this target will include the wisblock ethernet port? i think that's a good chunk of code we can guard. I can add a define for it.

Thank you, This device does not support ethernet port.

remove
-DMESHTASTIC_EXCLUDE_PAXCOUNTER=1
-DMESHTASTIC_EXCLUDE_AUDIO=1
@thebentern thebentern merged commit ff33a27 into meshtastic:master Nov 12, 2024
32 of 38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants