Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set stackTraceLimit to 0 in fileSystemEntryExists #40043

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 18, 2020

Conversation

gluxon
Copy link
Contributor

@gluxon gluxon commented Aug 13, 2020

The exception thrown by Node.js's fs.statSync function contains a stack trace that can be expensive to compute. Since this exception isn't used by fileSystemEntryExists, we can safely set Error.stackTraceLimit to 0 without a change in behavior.

A significant performance improvement was noticed with this change while profiling tsserver on packages within a proprietary monorepo. Specifically, my team saw high self time percentages for Node.js's uvException and handleErrorFromBinding internal functions. These functions are executed within fs.statSync when it fails to find the given path.

Screen Shot 2020-08-12 at 4 13 41 PM

fs.statSync: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/v14.4.0/lib/fs.js#L1030-L1037
handleErrorFromBinding: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/v14.4.0/lib/internal/fs/utils.js#L254-L269
uvException: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/v14.4.0/lib/internal/errors.js#L390-L443

Measurements

After adding Error.stackTraceLimit = 0, we saw:

  • For a large configured project with 12,565 files, tsserver reached the projectLoadingFinish event 48.78% faster. (~46.786s vs ~31.447s)
  • For a medium project with 7,064 files, tsserver was 25.75% faster. (~20.897s vs ~16.618s)
  • For a small project with 796 files, tsserver was only a negligible 3.00% faster. (~3.545s vs ~3.442)

Measurements were taken on macOS 10.15.6, Node.js 14.4.0, and a recent master commit of TypeScript (610fa28d). The average of 3 runs before and after this change were taken.

I would normally include .cpuprofile and isolate-*-*-*.log files, but can't post them publicly in this case. If there's any other summaries the TypeScript team would be curious about I can report them.

fs.statSync Misses

Within our monorepo, the fs.statSync misses were mostly searches for alternative file extensions of module imports.

  • For node_modules imports, a lot of .ts/.tsx lookups failed until the .d.ts file was found.
  • Within projects with a lot of JSX files, .ts files were looked for before finding the .tsx version.
  • In the medium scale project mentioned above, a total of 38,515 non-existent files were queried during createProgram.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the For Uncommitted Bug PR for untriaged, rejected, closed or missing bug label Aug 13, 2020
@gluxon
Copy link
Contributor Author

gluxon commented Aug 13, 2020

Tagging @amcasey due to the relation with PR #36190.

Please verify that:

  • There is an associated issue in the Backlog milestone (required)
  • Code is up-to-date with the master branch
  • You've successfully run gulp runtests locally
  • There are new or updated unit tests validating the change

New tests may be a bit difficult with this specific change. Open to any testing suggestions if anyone has them. Also not sure what the associated backlog issue for this should be.

if (!_fs.existsSync(path)) {
return false;
}

try {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another option is to just return using existsSync and ignore directory or file and make our code more tolerant (it might already be) for finding file instead of directory or vice versa. That could give us better perf in both cases.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely. I was also wondering how necessary it was to check for file versus folder existence.

I'm guessing the current behavior of this function is this way so folders ending with .ts get ignored. Is that an edge case where a behavior change would be acceptable?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you make a change we can see what user tests break and see what happens

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ended up not doing this and favoring Error.stackTraceLimit = 0 instead. I assume we wanted to try using existsSync entirely since we were worried about perf in the path exists case. Setting Error.stackTraceLimit = 0 should improve performance when files don't exist with no change to checking files that do exist.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@gluxon gluxon changed the title Avoid calling fs.statsSync for non-existent paths Set stackTraceLimit to 0 in fileSystemEntryExists Aug 14, 2020
@gluxon
Copy link
Contributor Author

gluxon commented Aug 14, 2020

I ended up removing the !fs.existsSync check favoring Error.stackTraceLimit = 0 instead. This is a pattern Node.js core uses as well: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/v14.4.0/lib/internal/errors.js#L414-L423 I reran some timings and this solution is comparable to the original in terms of performance gains.

Since the happy path (when the path exists) no longer calls both fs.existsSync and fs.statSync, I also removed the "Other Notes" caveat from the PR description.

@amcasey
Copy link
Member

amcasey commented Aug 14, 2020

@gluxon, it's precisely the file/dir distinction that prevented me from rolling out existsSync more broadly. It's possible we can add try-catches for the rare cases where the wrong type is found, but it seemed likely to be a pervasive change.

As an alternative, I've proposed a change to node itself: nodejs/node#33716

@amcasey
Copy link
Member

amcasey commented Aug 14, 2020

Without having re-reviewed the code, I'm also somewhat concerned that the exists/non-exists balance might be different in long-running watch or language service scenarios than it is during batch compilation.

@gluxon
Copy link
Contributor Author

gluxon commented Aug 14, 2020

As an alternative, I've proposed a change to node itself: nodejs/node#33716

That's a great proposed change. I was quite frustrated that there's no fast way to stat in node. Thanks for opening that.

Without having re-reviewed the code, I'm also somewhat concerned that the exists/non-exists balance might be different in long-running watch or language service scenarios than it is during batch compilation.

I ended up using the Error.stackTraceLimit = 0 trick mentioned in your link and isolated it to this specific hotspot. This change should be insensitive to the exists/non-exists balance.

The exception thrown by Node.js's fs.statSync function contains a stack
trace that can be expensive to compute. Since this exception isn't used
by fileSystemEntryExists, we can safely set Error.stackTraceLimit to 0
without a change in behavior.

---

A significant performance improvement was noticed with this change while
profiling tsserver on packages within a proprietary monorepo.
Specifically, my team saw high self time percentages for Node.js's
uvException and handleErrorFromBinding internal functions. These
functions are executed within fs.statSync when it fails to find the
given path.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/906558/90183227-220cb800-dd81-11ea-8d61-f41f89481f46.png

fs.statSync: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/v14.4.0/lib/fs.js#L1030-L1037
handleErrorFromBinding: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/v14.4.0/lib/internal/fs/utils.js#L254-L269
uvException: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/v14.4.0/lib/internal/errors.js#L390-L443

 ## Measurements

After adding Error.stackTraceLimit = 0, we saw:

- For a large configured project with 12,565 files, tsserver reached the
  projectLoadingFinish event 48.78% faster. (~46.786s vs ~31.447s)
- For a medium project with 7,064 files, tsserver was 25.75% faster.
  (~20.897s vs ~16.618s)
- For a small project with 796 files, tsserver was only a negligible
  3.00% faster. (~3.545s vs ~3.442)

Measurements were taken on macOS 10.15.6, Node.js 14.4.0, and a recent
master commit of TypeScript (610fa28). The average of 3 runs before and
after this change were taken.

I would normally include .cpuprofile and isolate-*-*-*.log files, but
can't post them publicly in this case. If there's any other summaries
the TypeScript team would be curious about I can report them.

 ## fs.statSync Misses

Within our monorepo, the fs.statSync misses were mostly searches for
alternative file extensions of module imports.

- For node_modules imports, a lot of .ts/.tsx lookups failed until the
  .d.ts file was found.
- Within projects with a lot of JSX files, .ts files were looked for
  before finding the .tsx version.
- In the medium scale project mentioned above, a total of 38,515
  non-existent files were queried during createProgram.
@gluxon
Copy link
Contributor Author

gluxon commented Aug 14, 2020

It looks like the node12 and node14 tests timed out cloning this PR. Pushing an amended commit to restart CI.

Copy link
Member

@amcasey amcasey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love the tailored mitigation!

@gluxon
Copy link
Contributor Author

gluxon commented Aug 14, 2020

Love the tailored mitigation!

Awesome. Thanks to you and @sheetalkamat for the fast reviews!

@sheetalkamat
Copy link
Member

@typescript-bot perf test this

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Aug 14, 2020

Heya @sheetalkamat, I've started to run the perf test suite on this PR at 930b81c. You can monitor the build here.

Update: The results are in!

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@sheetalkamat
The results of the perf run you requested are in!

Here they are:

Comparison Report - master..40043

Metric master 40043 Delta Best Worst
Angular - node (v10.16.3, x64)
Memory used 343,662k (± 0.01%) 343,182k (± 0.02%) -479k (- 0.14%) 343,011k 343,328k
Parse Time 2.01s (± 0.54%) 2.00s (± 0.65%) -0.01s (- 0.65%) 1.97s 2.04s
Bind Time 0.82s (± 0.60%) 0.82s (± 0.93%) -0.00s (- 0.00%) 0.80s 0.84s
Check Time 4.79s (± 0.55%) 4.77s (± 0.57%) -0.02s (- 0.33%) 4.70s 4.85s
Emit Time 5.21s (± 0.87%) 5.17s (± 0.67%) -0.03s (- 0.63%) 5.08s 5.25s
Total Time 12.82s (± 0.49%) 12.76s (± 0.46%) -0.06s (- 0.47%) 12.62s 12.87s
Monaco - node (v10.16.3, x64)
Memory used 339,295k (± 0.03%) 339,322k (± 0.04%) +27k (+ 0.01%) 339,104k 339,536k
Parse Time 1.58s (± 0.82%) 1.55s (± 0.75%) -0.03s (- 1.78%) 1.51s 1.57s
Bind Time 0.71s (± 0.91%) 0.72s (± 1.25%) +0.00s (+ 0.42%) 0.70s 0.74s
Check Time 4.93s (± 0.48%) 4.92s (± 0.57%) -0.01s (- 0.20%) 4.86s 4.99s
Emit Time 2.75s (± 0.78%) 2.75s (± 0.49%) 0.00s ( 0.00%) 2.72s 2.79s
Total Time 9.98s (± 0.39%) 9.94s (± 0.30%) -0.04s (- 0.39%) 9.89s 10.00s
TFS - node (v10.16.3, x64)
Memory used 302,095k (± 0.09%) 302,034k (± 0.02%) -61k (- 0.02%) 301,849k 302,144k
Parse Time 1.21s (± 0.84%) 1.21s (± 0.77%) +0.01s (+ 0.50%) 1.20s 1.23s
Bind Time 0.67s (± 1.05%) 0.66s (± 1.03%) -0.00s (- 0.75%) 0.64s 0.67s
Check Time 4.41s (± 0.37%) 4.41s (± 0.60%) +0.00s (+ 0.09%) 4.37s 4.47s
Emit Time 2.90s (± 1.21%) 2.89s (± 0.53%) -0.01s (- 0.28%) 2.85s 2.92s
Total Time 9.18s (± 0.54%) 9.18s (± 0.31%) -0.00s (- 0.01%) 9.13s 9.23s
material-ui - node (v10.16.3, x64)
Memory used 458,720k (± 0.02%) 458,427k (± 0.02%) -293k (- 0.06%) 458,333k 458,708k
Parse Time 2.04s (± 0.37%) 1.96s (± 0.78%) 🟩-0.09s (- 4.21%) 1.94s 2.01s
Bind Time 0.66s (± 1.46%) 0.65s (± 1.02%) -0.01s (- 1.21%) 0.64s 0.66s
Check Time 12.89s (± 0.66%) 12.87s (± 0.53%) -0.03s (- 0.20%) 12.73s 12.99s
Emit Time 0.00s (± 0.00%) 0.00s (± 0.00%) 0.00s ( NaN%) 0.00s 0.00s
Total Time 15.59s (± 0.58%) 15.47s (± 0.43%) -0.12s (- 0.78%) 15.33s 15.59s
Angular - node (v12.1.0, x64)
Memory used 320,833k (± 0.03%) 320,456k (± 0.02%) -377k (- 0.12%) 320,334k 320,653k
Parse Time 1.99s (± 0.62%) 1.97s (± 0.48%) -0.03s (- 1.35%) 1.95s 1.99s
Bind Time 0.80s (± 0.91%) 0.81s (± 0.61%) +0.00s (+ 0.50%) 0.80s 0.82s
Check Time 4.64s (± 0.51%) 4.64s (± 0.40%) +0.00s (+ 0.04%) 4.61s 4.68s
Emit Time 5.33s (± 0.57%) 5.30s (± 0.37%) -0.03s (- 0.56%) 5.26s 5.34s
Total Time 12.77s (± 0.36%) 12.72s (± 0.30%) -0.05s (- 0.38%) 12.65s 12.81s
Monaco - node (v12.1.0, x64)
Memory used 321,541k (± 0.02%) 321,532k (± 0.02%) -10k (- 0.00%) 321,370k 321,679k
Parse Time 1.55s (± 0.81%) 1.53s (± 0.95%) -0.01s (- 0.71%) 1.51s 1.57s
Bind Time 0.69s (± 0.52%) 0.69s (± 0.75%) -0.00s (- 0.43%) 0.68s 0.70s
Check Time 4.72s (± 0.54%) 4.69s (± 0.31%) -0.03s (- 0.66%) 4.66s 4.72s
Emit Time 2.82s (± 1.23%) 2.80s (± 0.58%) -0.02s (- 0.85%) 2.76s 2.83s
Total Time 9.79s (± 0.61%) 9.71s (± 0.23%) -0.07s (- 0.75%) 9.67s 9.75s
TFS - node (v12.1.0, x64)
Memory used 286,576k (± 0.02%) 286,531k (± 0.03%) -45k (- 0.02%) 286,392k 286,734k
Parse Time 1.22s (± 0.53%) 1.23s (± 0.65%) +0.01s (+ 0.49%) 1.21s 1.24s
Bind Time 0.64s (± 1.04%) 0.64s (± 0.97%) -0.00s (- 0.62%) 0.63s 0.66s
Check Time 4.32s (± 0.48%) 4.32s (± 0.36%) -0.01s (- 0.14%) 4.29s 4.36s
Emit Time 2.92s (± 0.83%) 2.92s (± 0.54%) +0.00s (+ 0.07%) 2.90s 2.97s
Total Time 9.11s (± 0.44%) 9.11s (± 0.27%) +0.00s (+ 0.03%) 9.05s 9.17s
material-ui - node (v12.1.0, x64)
Memory used 436,816k (± 0.07%) 436,750k (± 0.04%) -66k (- 0.02%) 436,006k 436,994k
Parse Time 2.02s (± 0.60%) 1.96s (± 0.51%) -0.06s (- 2.96%) 1.94s 1.98s
Bind Time 0.63s (± 0.94%) 0.62s (± 1.09%) -0.01s (- 1.58%) 0.61s 0.64s
Check Time 11.69s (± 1.14%) 11.53s (± 0.51%) -0.15s (- 1.32%) 11.40s 11.70s
Emit Time 0.00s (± 0.00%) 0.00s (± 0.00%) 0.00s ( NaN%) 0.00s 0.00s
Total Time 14.34s (± 0.99%) 14.12s (± 0.45%) -0.23s (- 1.57%) 13.99s 14.29s
Angular - node (v8.9.0, x64)
Memory used 340,175k (± 0.01%) 339,817k (± 0.02%) -359k (- 0.11%) 339,691k 339,990k
Parse Time 2.54s (± 0.14%) 2.53s (± 0.46%) -0.02s (- 0.59%) 2.50s 2.55s
Bind Time 0.86s (± 0.80%) 0.85s (± 0.76%) -0.01s (- 0.93%) 0.84s 0.86s
Check Time 5.39s (± 0.70%) 5.39s (± 0.50%) -0.00s (- 0.09%) 5.34s 5.46s
Emit Time 5.96s (± 0.63%) 5.82s (± 1.30%) -0.14s (- 2.38%) 5.67s 5.93s
Total Time 14.76s (± 0.47%) 14.59s (± 0.57%) -0.17s (- 1.15%) 14.42s 14.77s
Monaco - node (v8.9.0, x64)
Memory used 340,538k (± 0.01%) 340,538k (± 0.02%) +0k (+ 0.00%) 340,347k 340,656k
Parse Time 1.88s (± 0.50%) 1.87s (± 0.36%) -0.00s (- 0.16%) 1.86s 1.89s
Bind Time 0.89s (± 0.82%) 0.88s (± 0.67%) -0.00s (- 0.45%) 0.87s 0.90s
Check Time 5.47s (± 0.65%) 5.44s (± 0.43%) -0.02s (- 0.44%) 5.40s 5.51s
Emit Time 3.25s (± 1.27%) 3.24s (± 0.86%) -0.01s (- 0.22%) 3.18s 3.33s
Total Time 11.48s (± 0.70%) 11.44s (± 0.31%) -0.04s (- 0.32%) 11.37s 11.53s
TFS - node (v8.9.0, x64)
Memory used 303,825k (± 0.01%) 303,819k (± 0.02%) -6k (- 0.00%) 303,702k 303,982k
Parse Time 1.55s (± 0.66%) 1.54s (± 0.47%) -0.01s (- 0.58%) 1.53s 1.56s
Bind Time 0.68s (± 0.54%) 0.68s (± 1.01%) -0.00s (- 0.15%) 0.66s 0.69s
Check Time 5.06s (± 1.50%) 5.10s (± 1.25%) +0.03s (+ 0.67%) 4.92s 5.23s
Emit Time 3.01s (± 3.32%) 3.01s (± 2.68%) +0.00s (+ 0.03%) 2.91s 3.21s
Total Time 10.30s (± 0.48%) 10.32s (± 0.44%) +0.02s (+ 0.22%) 10.24s 10.41s
material-ui - node (v8.9.0, x64)
Memory used 462,986k (± 0.02%) 462,725k (± 0.01%) -261k (- 0.06%) 462,625k 462,933k
Parse Time 2.40s (± 0.52%) 2.39s (± 0.46%) -0.01s (- 0.46%) 2.37s 2.42s
Bind Time 0.79s (± 1.04%) 0.78s (± 0.93%) -0.01s (- 1.51%) 0.77s 0.80s
Check Time 17.13s (± 0.99%) 17.13s (± 1.35%) -0.00s (- 0.00%) 16.70s 17.63s
Emit Time 0.00s (± 0.00%) 0.00s (± 0.00%) 0.00s ( NaN%) 0.00s 0.00s
Total Time 20.33s (± 0.86%) 20.30s (± 1.14%) -0.03s (- 0.16%) 19.90s 20.79s
Angular - node (v8.9.0, x86)
Memory used 195,186k (± 0.02%) 195,041k (± 0.04%) -146k (- 0.07%) 194,853k 195,187k
Parse Time 2.46s (± 0.70%) 2.45s (± 0.71%) -0.02s (- 0.69%) 2.43s 2.50s
Bind Time 0.98s (± 1.19%) 0.98s (± 0.69%) +0.00s (+ 0.31%) 0.96s 0.99s
Check Time 4.88s (± 0.58%) 4.83s (± 0.53%) -0.05s (- 1.00%) 4.79s 4.90s
Emit Time 5.91s (± 0.60%) 5.89s (± 0.95%) -0.02s (- 0.37%) 5.73s 6.01s
Total Time 14.23s (± 0.34%) 14.15s (± 0.59%) -0.09s (- 0.61%) 13.95s 14.38s
Monaco - node (v8.9.0, x86)
Memory used 193,576k (± 0.02%) 193,564k (± 0.03%) -12k (- 0.01%) 193,460k 193,726k
Parse Time 1.91s (± 0.78%) 1.91s (± 1.02%) -0.00s (- 0.21%) 1.87s 1.96s
Bind Time 0.70s (± 0.95%) 0.70s (± 0.95%) -0.00s (- 0.43%) 0.69s 0.72s
Check Time 5.54s (± 0.62%) 5.56s (± 0.80%) +0.02s (+ 0.38%) 5.46s 5.66s
Emit Time 2.67s (± 0.69%) 2.67s (± 0.82%) +0.00s (+ 0.04%) 2.63s 2.72s
Total Time 10.82s (± 0.57%) 10.83s (± 0.48%) +0.01s (+ 0.14%) 10.75s 10.97s
TFS - node (v8.9.0, x86)
Memory used 173,811k (± 0.04%) 173,787k (± 0.02%) -24k (- 0.01%) 173,684k 173,867k
Parse Time 1.59s (± 1.13%) 1.59s (± 0.76%) -0.00s (- 0.13%) 1.57s 1.63s
Bind Time 0.64s (± 0.74%) 0.65s (± 1.12%) +0.01s (+ 0.78%) 0.64s 0.67s
Check Time 4.66s (± 0.59%) 4.67s (± 0.70%) +0.01s (+ 0.26%) 4.58s 4.74s
Emit Time 2.80s (± 0.73%) 2.78s (± 1.04%) -0.02s (- 0.64%) 2.71s 2.85s
Total Time 9.70s (± 0.51%) 9.69s (± 0.57%) -0.01s (- 0.06%) 9.57s 9.78s
material-ui - node (v8.9.0, x86)
Memory used 262,229k (± 0.02%) 262,096k (± 0.01%) -133k (- 0.05%) 262,011k 262,175k
Parse Time 2.44s (± 0.51%) 2.44s (± 0.61%) +0.00s (+ 0.12%) 2.42s 2.47s
Bind Time 0.69s (± 2.62%) 0.68s (± 1.58%) -0.01s (- 1.59%) 0.66s 0.70s
Check Time 15.66s (± 0.97%) 15.69s (± 0.83%) +0.03s (+ 0.19%) 15.47s 16.15s
Emit Time 0.00s (± 0.00%) 0.00s (± 0.00%) 0.00s ( NaN%) 0.00s 0.00s
Total Time 18.79s (± 0.88%) 18.81s (± 0.71%) +0.02s (+ 0.11%) 18.57s 19.29s
System
Machine Namets-ci-ubuntu
Platformlinux 4.4.0-166-generic
Architecturex64
Available Memory16 GB
Available Memory1 GB
CPUs4 × Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Hosts
  • node (v10.16.3, x64)
  • node (v12.1.0, x64)
  • node (v8.9.0, x64)
  • node (v8.9.0, x86)
Scenarios
  • Angular - node (v10.16.3, x64)
  • Angular - node (v12.1.0, x64)
  • Angular - node (v8.9.0, x64)
  • Angular - node (v8.9.0, x86)
  • Monaco - node (v10.16.3, x64)
  • Monaco - node (v12.1.0, x64)
  • Monaco - node (v8.9.0, x64)
  • Monaco - node (v8.9.0, x86)
  • TFS - node (v10.16.3, x64)
  • TFS - node (v12.1.0, x64)
  • TFS - node (v8.9.0, x64)
  • TFS - node (v8.9.0, x86)
  • material-ui - node (v10.16.3, x64)
  • material-ui - node (v12.1.0, x64)
  • material-ui - node (v8.9.0, x64)
  • material-ui - node (v8.9.0, x86)
Benchmark Name Iterations
Current 40043 10
Baseline master 10

@ericjeney
Copy link

Would it be possible to backport this to the 4.0 branch as well, once merged? My team is eager to get this performance improvement as soon as possible.

@amcasey
Copy link
Member

amcasey commented Aug 14, 2020

@ericjeney What kind of improvement are you seeing? When I was investigating (before this PR), it looked like it was in the 5% range, which is certainly very nice, but is not hold-the-release. Having data from real customers would make it easier to argue for a late change.

@ericjeney
Copy link

@gluxon and I are on the same team, so my results are similar to his. We work on a code base of ~1,500,000 lines of TypeScript spread across ~500 packages.

In addition to the benchmarks he noted above, I tested on a patched version of tsserver.js in VS Code and timed the "Initializing JS/TS Language Features..." prompt after selecting the Restart TS Server action. I noted a ~20% improvement for several packages, going from a consistent 38s => 28-30s for one of them.

If not in 4.0, is this the sort of change you would ship in a patch release? Or are patch releases reserved for regressions?

@amcasey
Copy link
Member

amcasey commented Aug 14, 2020

@ericjeney We'll have to discuss the potential risks, but those numbers are pretty exciting. I'll post more when I know more.

@ericjeney
Copy link

Thank you!

I just confirmed with another coworker as well, who works on a separate monorepo, and saw a >25% improvement on one of their packages (17.5s => 13s), so the improvement seems to not be isolated to only the codebase that I work on.

@amcasey
Copy link
Member

amcasey commented Aug 18, 2020

@ericjeney If things look good in nightly builds, this will be a strong candidate for inclusion in a patch release. No promises though.

@gluxon
Copy link
Contributor Author

gluxon commented Aug 18, 2020

Thanks for the update @amcasey! Is there anything I still need to do on our side before this can merge?

@amcasey amcasey merged commit 5ff1b75 into microsoft:master Aug 18, 2020
Copy link
Member

@weswigham weswigham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it matters this much, TBH, we should consider doing this for all the falliable FS operations in sys.ts that we just eat the error on - realpath, getModifiedTime/setModifiedTime, deleteFile, createDirectory, getFileSize, writeFile, getAccessibleFileSystemEntries, fileSystemEntryExists, and watchPresentFileSystemEntry (all of them combined will probably also represent measurable savings under --build or --watch)

Simultaneously, a gripe: Why isn't Error.prototype.stack a lazier getter 😦 I feel like this could also be "fixed" in node.

@amcasey
Copy link
Member

amcasey commented Aug 18, 2020

@gluxon, nope, just wanted to hear from @sheetalkamat. 😄 Thanks again!

@gluxon gluxon deleted the uvException-hotspot branch August 18, 2020 21:00
@ericanderson
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @amcasey / @weswigham / @sheetalkamat !

@amcasey
Copy link
Member

amcasey commented Sep 8, 2020

@typescript-bot cherry-pick this to release-4.0

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Sep 8, 2020

Heya @amcasey, I've started to run the task to cherry-pick this into release-4.0 on this PR at 930b81c. You can monitor the build here.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @amcasey, I couldn't open a PR with the cherry-pick. (You can check the log here). You may need to squash and pick this PR into release-4.0 manually.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
For Uncommitted Bug PR for untriaged, rejected, closed or missing bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants