-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed an issue in boolean comparison narrowing when the reference is an optional chain #56504
Merged
jakebailey
merged 3 commits into
microsoft:main
from
Andarist:fix/boolean-comparison-narrowing-vs-optional-chains
Nov 22, 2023
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
48 changes: 48 additions & 0 deletions
48
tests/baselines/reference/controlFlowOptionalChain3.symbols
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ | ||
//// [tests/cases/conformance/controlFlow/controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts] //// | ||
|
||
=== controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts === | ||
// https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/56482 | ||
|
||
interface Foo { | ||
>Foo : Symbol(Foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 0, 0)) | ||
|
||
bar: boolean; | ||
>bar : Symbol(Foo.bar, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 2, 15)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
function test1(foo: Foo | undefined) { | ||
>test1 : Symbol(test1, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 4, 1)) | ||
>foo : Symbol(foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 6, 15)) | ||
>Foo : Symbol(Foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 0, 0)) | ||
|
||
if (foo?.bar === false) { | ||
>foo?.bar : Symbol(Foo.bar, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 2, 15)) | ||
>foo : Symbol(foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 6, 15)) | ||
>bar : Symbol(Foo.bar, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 2, 15)) | ||
|
||
foo; | ||
>foo : Symbol(foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 6, 15)) | ||
} | ||
foo; | ||
>foo : Symbol(foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 6, 15)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
function test2(foo: Foo | undefined) { | ||
>test2 : Symbol(test2, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 11, 1)) | ||
>foo : Symbol(foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 13, 15)) | ||
>Foo : Symbol(Foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 0, 0)) | ||
|
||
if (foo?.bar === false) { | ||
>foo?.bar : Symbol(Foo.bar, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 2, 15)) | ||
>foo : Symbol(foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 13, 15)) | ||
>bar : Symbol(Foo.bar, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 2, 15)) | ||
|
||
foo; | ||
>foo : Symbol(foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 13, 15)) | ||
|
||
} else { | ||
foo; | ||
>foo : Symbol(foo, Decl(controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts, 13, 15)) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ | ||
//// [tests/cases/conformance/controlFlow/controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts] //// | ||
|
||
=== controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts === | ||
// https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/56482 | ||
|
||
interface Foo { | ||
bar: boolean; | ||
>bar : boolean | ||
} | ||
|
||
function test1(foo: Foo | undefined) { | ||
>test1 : (foo: Foo | undefined) => void | ||
>foo : Foo | undefined | ||
|
||
if (foo?.bar === false) { | ||
>foo?.bar === false : boolean | ||
>foo?.bar : boolean | undefined | ||
>foo : Foo | undefined | ||
>bar : boolean | undefined | ||
>false : false | ||
|
||
foo; | ||
>foo : Foo | ||
} | ||
foo; | ||
>foo : Foo | undefined | ||
} | ||
|
||
function test2(foo: Foo | undefined) { | ||
>test2 : (foo: Foo | undefined) => void | ||
>foo : Foo | undefined | ||
|
||
if (foo?.bar === false) { | ||
>foo?.bar === false : boolean | ||
>foo?.bar : boolean | undefined | ||
>foo : Foo | undefined | ||
>bar : boolean | undefined | ||
>false : false | ||
|
||
foo; | ||
>foo : Foo | ||
|
||
} else { | ||
foo; | ||
>foo : Foo | undefined | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions
23
tests/cases/conformance/controlFlow/controlFlowOptionalChain3.ts
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | ||
// @strict: true | ||
// @noEmit: true | ||
|
||
// https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/56482 | ||
|
||
interface Foo { | ||
bar: boolean; | ||
} | ||
|
||
function test1(foo: Foo | undefined) { | ||
if (foo?.bar === false) { | ||
foo; | ||
} | ||
foo; | ||
} | ||
|
||
function test2(foo: Foo | undefined) { | ||
if (foo?.bar === false) { | ||
foo; | ||
} else { | ||
foo; | ||
} | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It turns out that the original
type
can be reassigned based onoptionalChainContainsReference
. That messed up the else branch becausenarrowTypeByBooleanComparison
was operating on the wrong type.I've also tried keeping
originalType
around and pass that tonarrowTypeByBooleanComparison
. That fixed the reported issue~ related to the wrong type in the else branch but it broke the same type within the if block. This happened because originally the intention was for that reassignedtype
to be returned through thereturn
at the bottom of this function but I changed it to returnoriginalType
throughnarrowTypeByBooleanComparison
.So all in all, this seems like the simplest fix and reflects the intention the best. The motivation behind the original change was to improve non-access expression narrowing. Access expressions are already handled by discrimination-based narrowing etc.
Even though it worked previously (as far as I know) for non-optional chain access expressions, this helps them avoid some redundant work too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems fine as a quick fix for now, though I suspect that we could try and do better later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then again, not sure what "better" even means; an expression like
(options?.a === false || options.b
is not the same as(!options?.a || options.b)
so realistically I don't think there's any extra info gained here.