adding option of using buffered image reader for faster dmverity hashing #2013
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
related PR: #1887
We previously set the default to an unbuffered reader for the sake of memory efficiency. This PR adds the option back in to use a buffered reader for users with ample available memory. This allows for faster dmverity hashing if needed.
Testing in a VM with a 1.5GB image, an unbuffered reader uses 1/4 the RAM but takes 3x longer for dmverity hashing (from 20s up to 1m). With a swing that large either way, it would be nice to give users the option to choose which they want for use in the confcom plugin. Thanks!