MAINT: Work around MNE change

[larsoner]

Don't use mne.utils.has_nibabel since it's gone as of mne-tools/mne-python#11578. Instead, use the _import_nibabel pattern which gives a nicer traceback (I think) more compactly:

$ python -c "import mne_bids.utils; mne_bids.utils._import_nibabel()"
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/Users/larsoner/python/mne-bids/mne_bids/utils.py", line 465, in _import_nibabel
    raise exc.__class__(
ModuleNotFoundError: nibabel is required to work with MRI data but could not be imported, got: No module named 'nibabel'

[sappelhoff]

Thanks for having an eye on this @larsoner

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1128 (ca2877d) into main (f053191) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 91.66%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1128      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.29%   95.27%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          40       40              
  Lines        8677     8679       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         8269     8269              
- Misses        408      410       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
mne_bids/utils.py	94.92% <66.66%> (-0.89%)	⬇️
mne_bids/dig.py	98.24% <100.00%> (ø)
mne_bids/read.py	95.80% <100.00%> (ø)
mne_bids/tests/test_read.py	98.47% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
mne_bids/tests/test_update.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
mne_bids/tests/test_write.py	90.31% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
mne_bids/write.py	97.28% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[larsoner]

All good except codecov which I think we can ignore

[hoechenberger]

Great, can you add a changelog entry? Something like, "support latest MNE-Python" or so?