-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: switch two-column list styles to be opt-in #5110
chore: switch two-column list styles to be opt-in #5110
Conversation
- Adds the two-column class with the expected style for two-column unordered lists, making sure to keep the two-column style at Features and Table of Contents - Removes column style from ul element scope
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functionally looks good, nicely done! 🎨
Requesting changes on a bit of refactoring to make the styles more clear.
92c6187
to
c358aae
Compare
Use the class two-column instead of applying the style by using its id.
Move margin-top and padding inside two-column as they are overwritten within single-column.
@JoshuaKGoldberg The 'Deploy Preview' check has failed even before I committed the requested changes (when I merged master to my branch), but I'm not authorized to open Netlify to check the error. Is there another way for me to verify that? Thanks! |
...huh, that's a new one.
Does that happen for you? I'm traveling right now and blocked from trying it locally on #5113. |
I can see this error locally now! It seems to be happening due to Eleventy not being able to parse the properties of an object on the Jsdocs api at
* @return {FullErrorStack}
...
/**
* An object containing the full error stack results
* @private
* @typedef {Object} FullErrorStack
* @property {string} message
* @property {string} msg
* @property {string} stack
*/ So please let me know your preferences and whether we should be opening those changes in another PR or if we could just apply them on this one. |
Nice investigation! 👏 Does that happen for you on the If it's unique to this branch (?!) then it'd be something to fix here. |
Requested changes were applied and all checks are passing after fix on #5116. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @marjys! |
PR Checklist
status: accepting prs
Overview
This PR: