Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade copyfiles from 2.1.1 to 2.2.0 #325

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2020

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@snyk-bot snyk-bot commented Jun 5, 2020

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade copyfiles from 2.1.1 to 2.2.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.
  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 5 months ago, on 2020-01-17.
Release notes
Package name: copyfiles from copyfiles GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: copyfiles

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@snyk-bot snyk-bot requested a review from a team June 5, 2020 01:22
Copy link
Member

@bingenito bingenito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested [email protected] locally and looks good. Expected snyk upgrade to 2.3.0 two weeks from now.

@bingenito bingenito merged commit 31f86a5 into master Jun 5, 2020
@bingenito bingenito deleted the snyk-upgrade-c47a2fab525b41485bfd4255d32d06b4 branch June 5, 2020 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants