Slightly improved test coverage for vertical text #6399
Conversation
Our current test coverage for vertical text is somewhat lacking, as evident from e.g. issue 6387. That regression could easily have been avoided if the `taro` test-case would have been an `eq` test, as well as an `text` test.
|
/botio test |
From: Bot.io (Windows)ReceivedCommand cmd_test from @Snuffleupagus received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://107.22.172.223:8877/941b37febdf078c/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux)ReceivedCommand cmd_test from @Snuffleupagus received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://107.21.233.14:8877/769358cdc36e3f6/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Windows)SuccessFull output at http://107.22.172.223:8877/941b37febdf078c/output.txt Total script time: 18.93 mins
|
From: Bot.io (Linux)SuccessFull output at http://107.21.233.14:8877/769358cdc36e3f6/output.txt Total script time: 19.28 mins
|
|
/botio makeref |
From: Bot.io (Windows)ReceivedCommand cmd_makeref from @timvandermeij received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://107.22.172.223:8877/7cf1fffabf5f572/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux)ReceivedCommand cmd_makeref from @timvandermeij received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://107.21.233.14:8877/dc81d979dff0f7c/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Windows)SuccessFull output at http://107.22.172.223:8877/7cf1fffabf5f572/output.txt Total script time: 18.07 mins
|
From: Bot.io (Linux)SuccessFull output at http://107.21.233.14:8877/dc81d979dff0f7c/output.txt Total script time: 19.31 mins
|
Slightly improved test coverage for vertical text
|
Thank you for your work on the tests! |
Our current test coverage for vertical text is somewhat lacking, as evident from e.g. issue #6387. That regression could easily have been avoided if the
tarotest-case would have been aneqtest, as well as antexttest.