Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding rho jump proposals for free spectra #189

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 5, 2023

Conversation

astrolamb
Copy link
Contributor

@Hazboun6 I finally got around to including your rho jump proposal code to e_e. I think it's important for those who are trying to model the monopole as free specs

@astrolamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test failures are all linting issues for code I didn't develop :/

removing flake8 to fix linting issues, thanks @AaronDJohnson
@AaronDJohnson
Copy link
Collaborator

@astrolamb can you update this PR?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #189 (8e9d9b7) into master (5e0f99d) will decrease coverage by 0.10%.
The diff coverage is 15.78%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #189      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   37.34%   37.23%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        3950     3969      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         1475     1478       +3     
- Misses       2475     2491      +16     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
enterprise_extensions/sampler.py 38.00% <12.50%> (-0.58%) ⬇️
enterprise_extensions/hypermodel.py 48.30% <33.33%> (-0.20%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5e0f99d...8e9d9b7. Read the comment docs.

@astrolamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AaronDJohnson all checks passed :)

@Hazboun6 Hazboun6 merged commit a46be21 into nanograv:master Jan 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants