Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue649 addd diagnostic fsd #661
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Issue649 addd diagnostic fsd #661
Changes from 5 commits
b940e76
37c9456
7937ea4
9015d5f
3b31cad
7e76947
6716f34
75472e3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you add an explanation for the ordering? It looks like you start at the largest floe size bin and decrease - what is the reason for that? (I would expect the other way so if 90% of the ice is in the smallest bin you'd stop there with a small Dmax, otherwise keep increasing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So happy you're back! Hmmm I haven't changed the ordering actually. I suppose my reasoning at the time was that there is more elements with unbroken ice than with broken ice, so the loop would stop faster starting from the larger floes. If it really does not make sense to you, I can rewrite it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unless I am misunderstanding, the current Dmax comes from
\int_{Dmax}^\infty = 0.9
, but reversing gives\int_0^{Dmax} = 0.9
? These are quite different. But perhaps we could think about it and if it is important and change it in the other branchThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I defined M_dmax_c_threshold as (1-0.9) to account for that, that's ok no? Super confusing with these comments though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks like D_dchar but for mech FSD?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is! I am reluctant to change that as it is what we published, but to be consistent with assumptions from scattering parameterizations, I should have not used the areal FSD. However, that would be assuming that absolutely all floes contribute to scattering, which is likely to be wrong. I can discuss that with you at some point.