Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor entity services to receive the request #117

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024

Conversation

wcalderipe
Copy link
Collaborator

This refactor will allow us to do further validations on the request like signature verifications.

@wcalderipe wcalderipe self-assigned this Feb 19, 2024
@wcalderipe wcalderipe merged commit 93baabc into main Feb 19, 2024
2 checks passed
@wcalderipe wcalderipe deleted the chore/refactor-entity-serviecs branch March 5, 2024 14:17
mattschoch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
* Refactor entity services to receive the request

* Fix authz admin E2E test
wcalderipe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
* removed operations, scope sync can partially succeed

* refactor bitgo and fireblocks

* tests fixed for new interface

* removed unused services imports

* adding logs to the wallet bulkUpsert method

* networkMap is a map, addressed namings, used constants instead of numbers

* namings, complete function handles partial success for scoped sync service

* lock sync when there's already an in progresss sync for this connection

* Trying larger runner

* fixed the network caching, and the lock on scope sync

* Revert "Trying larger runner"

This reverts commit bda1bb6b3154ae3f71740bbbcf7d0aca263649dc.

* raw account errors are more precise

* fireblocks raw accounts building use external network id

* fixed reads for upserts outside of tx scope

* exists take the status as a parameter

* removed unused function

* fixed fireblocks scoped sync mock server declaration

---------

Co-authored-by: Matt Schoch <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant