Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade chalk from 4.1.2 to 5.3.0 #3

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nerdy-tech-com-gitub
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade chalk from 4.1.2 to 5.3.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


⚠️ Warning: This PR contains major version upgrade(s), and may be a breaking change.

  • The recommended version is 7 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on a year ago.

Release notes
Package name: chalk from chalk GitHub release notes

Important

  • Warning: This PR contains a major version upgrade, and may be a breaking change.
  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade chalk from 4.1.2 to 5.3.0.

See this package in npm:
chalk

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/nerds-github/project/a2025a67-2a02-40c3-a2cf-7d54d09d4d47?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!


Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

sweep-ai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Hey @nerds-github, here is an example of how you can ask me to improve this pull request:

@Sweep Add unit tests to verify that the application still works correctly with the new ESM-only version of chalk (v5). Specifically:
- Test that chalk color formatting still works as expected
- Test that any template literal usage has been properly migrated to use chalk-template instead
- Test that any usage of removed methods (keyword(), hsl(), hsv(), hwb(), ansi()) have been properly replaced with alternatives

📖 For more information on how to use Sweep, please read our documentation.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

  • It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!
  • We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants