-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Documentation Improvement #110
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #110 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.42% 87.42%
=======================================
Files 23 23
Lines 2863 2863
=======================================
Hits 2503 2503
Misses 360 360 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Hi, a few minor changes.
all minor warning from the mkdocs autochcker:
|
Hi @JuliusWelzel , Thanks for the valuable feedback. I have tried to address all the concerns and have committed the revisions in 218949f . Could you please check the revisions, and if they meet the requirements, merge the branch into the main branch? Best, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The mermaid dataclass diagram has not changed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handled here: 0185add
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do not add it to the code but remove the progress bar from the documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is handled here: 73bad3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handled in 5514104
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handled in 5514104
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You have to change the docstring of this function
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handled here e6a4ab1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handled here: 7026ba2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There should not be example with the same number. Maybe we can name them 1-8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handled here: 3a21b36
I also got more warning from mkdocs:
|
For the future, please make sure you can run |
I handled all these warnings and I do not get them when I render locally. |
@JuliusWelzel Thanks for the feedback. I handled all the reviews and locally rendered them without any warnings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am happy with the changes, maybe @rmndrs89 can also review. Once done, we are good to go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do **kwargs
need to be specified as a dictionary? See here
Dear @rmndrs89 and @JuliusWelzel ,
Could you please review the improvements in the documentation? If they meet your requirements, could you please merge the branch into the main branch?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Masoud