Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IBM i CI failures #43509

Closed
4 tasks done
richardlau opened this issue Jun 20, 2022 · 19 comments
Closed
4 tasks done

IBM i CI failures #43509

richardlau opened this issue Jun 20, 2022 · 19 comments
Labels
ibm i Issues and PRs related to the IBM i platform.

Comments

@richardlau
Copy link
Member

richardlau commented Jun 20, 2022

It looks like the IBM CI has been red for as long as we've got history: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/

From the latest CI run, https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/798/#showFailuresLink, filtering out the tests already marked flaky we have these failures:


test.parallel/test-fs-readSync-position-validation

node:fs:747
  handleErrorFromBinding(ctx);
  ^

Error: EOVERFLOW: value too large for defined data type, read
    at Object.readSync (node:fs:747:3)
    at testValid (file:///home/IOJS/build/workspace/node-test-commit-ibmi/nodes/ibmi73-ppc64/test/parallel/test-fs-readSync-position-validation.mjs:20:8)
    at file:///home/IOJS/build/workspace/node-test-commit-ibmi/nodes/ibmi73-ppc64/test/parallel/test-fs-readSync-position-validation.mjs:60:3
    at ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:197:25)
    at async Promise.all (index 0)
    at async ESMLoader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:549:24)
    at async loadESM (node:internal/process/esm_loader:83:5)
    at async handleMainPromise (node:internal/modules/run_main:65:12) {
  errno: -127,
  syscall: 'read',
  code: 'EOVERFLOW'
}

Node.js v19.0.0-pre

test.parallel/test-icu-env

timeout

test.parallel/test-fs-read-position-validation

node:internal/process/esm_loader:89
    internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException(
                              ^

[Error: EOVERFLOW: value too large for defined data type, read] {
  errno: -127,
  code: 'EOVERFLOW',
  syscall: 'read'
}

Node.js v19.0.0-pre

test.parallel/test-v8-serialize-leak

node:assert:399
    throw err;
    ^

AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: before=0 after=0
    at Object.<anonymous> (/home/IOJS/build/workspace/node-test-commit-ibmi/nodes/ibmi73-ppc64/test/parallel/test-v8-serialize-leak.js:21:3)
    at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1116:14)
    at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1170:10)
    at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:994:32)
    at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:834:12)
    at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:81:12)
    at node:internal/main/run_main_module:17:47 {
  generatedMessage: false,
  code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
  actual: false,
  expected: true,
  operator: '=='
}

Node.js v19.0.0-pre

cc @nodejs/platform-ibmi

@richardlau richardlau added the ibm i Issues and PRs related to the IBM i platform. label Jun 20, 2022
@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

These two are variations on #36925 (comment). I'll open a PR to add EOVERFLOW to the allowed list of errors.

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

I suspect this one is that IBM i doesn't (cannot?) report memory usage: #32043 (comment)

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

@V-for-Vasili, since you volunteered to look, please take a look at test-icu-env on IBM i. It was added back in May by #42683 and appears to be timing out on IBM i, e.g. https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/798/nodes=ibmi73-ppc64/testReport/junit/(root)/test/parallel_test_icu_env/

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`.

PR-URL: #43510
Refs: #42999
Refs: #43509
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@V-for-Vasili
Copy link
Contributor

V-for-Vasili commented Jun 22, 2022

Looks like the whole test takes about 3m to complete on IBMi compared to about 11seconds on x64 linux.
All test assertions take comparable time to complete (there is not one that is significantly longer then the rest).
I think marking it SLOW could be an acceptable solution here.

Does not look like SLOW is an option for Release build, PR to skip: #43559

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
On IBM i rss memory information is not available and always returns `0`.

PR-URL: #43511
Refs: #43509
Refs: libuv/libuv#2732
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
F3n67u pushed a commit to F3n67u/node that referenced this issue Jun 24, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`.

PR-URL: nodejs#43510
Refs: nodejs#42999
Refs: nodejs#43509
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
F3n67u pushed a commit to F3n67u/node that referenced this issue Jun 24, 2022
On IBM i rss memory information is not available and always returns `0`.

PR-URL: nodejs#43511
Refs: nodejs#43509
Refs: libuv/libuv#2732
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

I edited the IBM i Jenkins job to increase the test timeout from the default 2 mins to 5 mins (via TEST_CI_ARGS="-t 300").

test-icu-env passed in https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/803/nodes=ibmi73-ppc64/#showFailuresLink 🎉

It looks like we've gained two new failures in

@V-for-Vasili
Copy link
Contributor

I assume this is not needed then #43559 if we intend to keep the timeout 5minutes on ibmi?

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

I assume this is not needed then #43559 if we intend to keep the timeout 5minutes on ibmi?

Yeah, sorry about that. I'd be happy to keep the timeout on IBM i at 5 minutes (or even extend further if we find it necessary to do so).

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

The two new failures are problems opening a test fixture:

09:24:45     NEW
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:45       'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:45       'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n'
09:24:45     Failed test # 8
09:24:45     /home/IOJS/build/workspace/node-test-commit-ibmi/nodes/ibmi73-ppc64/test/parallel/test-repl-persistent-history.js:234
09:24:45               throw err;
09:24:45               ^
09:24:45     
09:24:45     AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected values to be strictly equal:
09:24:45     + actual - expected
09:24:45     
09:24:45     + '\n' +
09:24:45     +   'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:45     +   'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n'
09:24:45     - undefined
09:24:45         at Writable.write [as _write] (/home/IOJS/build/workspace/node-test-commit-ibmi/nodes/ibmi73-ppc64/test/parallel/test-repl-persistent-history.js:231:18)
09:24:45         at writeOrBuffer (node:internal/streams/writable:392:12)
09:24:45         at _write (node:internal/streams/writable:333:10)
09:24:45         at Writable.write (node:internal/streams/writable:337:10)
09:24:45         at [_writeToOutput] [as _writeToOutput] (node:internal/readline/interface:445:19)
09:24:45         at _writeToOutput (node:internal/repl/history:29:8)
09:24:45         at oninit (node:internal/repl/history:69:7)
09:24:45         at FSReqCallback.oncomplete (node:fs:201:23)
09:24:45         at FSReqCallback.callbackTrampoline (node:internal/async_hooks:130:17) {
09:24:45       generatedMessage: true,
09:24:45       code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
09:24:45       actual: '\n' +
09:24:45         'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:45         'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n',
09:24:45       expected: undefined,
09:24:45       operator: 'strictEqual'
09:24:45     }
09:24:45 not ok 2227 parallel/test-repl-persistent-history
09:24:45   ---
09:24:45   duration_ms: 2.1
09:24:45   severity: fail
09:24:45   exitcode: 1
09:24:45   stack: |-
09:24:45     NEW
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:45       'Persistent history support disabled. Set the NODE_REPL_HISTORY environment\n' +
09:24:45       'variable to a valid, user-writable path to enable.\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     NEW
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:45       'Persistent history support disabled. Set the NODE_REPL_HISTORY environment\n' +
09:24:45       'variable to a valid, user-writable path to enable.\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     NEW
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT "> 'you look fabulous today'"
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[28G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     NEW
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '2'
09:24:45     INPUT '1'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '21\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT "'"
09:24:45     INPUT '4'
09:24:45     INPUT '2'
09:24:45     INPUT "'"
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     INPUT "'42'\n"
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     NEW
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT "> '42'"
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[7G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> 21'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[5G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT "> '42'"
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[7G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> 21'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[5G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '21\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     NEW
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT "> 'you look fabulous today'"
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[28G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT "> 'you look fabulous today'"
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[28G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     NEW
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:45       'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:45       'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:45       'Persistent history support disabled. Set the NODE_REPL_HISTORY environment\n' +
09:24:45       'variable to a valid, user-writable path to enable.\n'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:45     NEW
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:45     INPUT '> '
09:24:45     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:45     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:45       'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:45       'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n'
09:24:45     Failed test # 8
09:24:45     /home/IOJS/build/workspace/node-test-commit-ibmi/nodes/ibmi73-ppc64/test/parallel/test-repl-persistent-history.js:234
09:24:45               throw err;
09:24:45               ^
09:24:45     
09:24:45     AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected values to be strictly equal:
09:24:45     + actual - expected
09:24:45     
09:24:45     + '\n' +
09:24:45     +   'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:45     +   'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n'
09:24:45     - undefined
09:24:45         at Writable.write [as _write] (/home/IOJS/build/workspace/node-test-commit-ibmi/nodes/ibmi73-ppc64/test/parallel/test-repl-persistent-history.js:231:18)
09:24:45         at writeOrBuffer (node:internal/streams/writable:392:12)
09:24:45         at _write (node:internal/streams/writable:333:10)
09:24:45         at Writable.write (node:internal/streams/writable:337:10)
09:24:45         at [_writeToOutput] [as _writeToOutput] (node:internal/readline/interface:445:19)
09:24:45         at _writeToOutput (node:internal/repl/history:29:8)
09:24:45         at oninit (node:internal/repl/history:69:7)
09:24:45         at FSReqCallback.oncomplete (node:fs:201:23)
09:24:45         at FSReqCallback.callbackTrampoline (node:internal/async_hooks:130:17) {
09:24:45       generatedMessage: true,
09:24:45       code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
09:24:45       actual: '\n' +
09:24:45         'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:45         'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n',
09:24:45       expected: undefined,
09:24:45       operator: 'strictEqual'
09:24:45     }
09:24:45     
09:24:45     Node.js v19.0.0-pre
09:24:45   ...
...
09:24:47 not ok 2235 parallel/test-repl-programmatic-history
09:24:48   ---
09:24:48   duration_ms: 2.119
09:24:48   severity: fail
09:24:48   exitcode: 1
09:24:48   stack: |-
09:24:48     NEW
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:48       'Persistent history support disabled. Set the NODE_REPL_HISTORY environment\n' +
09:24:48       'variable to a valid, user-writable path to enable.\n'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     NEW
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:48       'Persistent history support disabled. Set the NODE_REPL_HISTORY environment\n' +
09:24:48       'variable to a valid, user-writable path to enable.\n'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     NEW
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT "> 'you look fabulous today'"
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[28G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     NEW
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '2'
09:24:48     INPUT '1'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     INPUT '21\n'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT "'"
09:24:48     INPUT '4'
09:24:48     INPUT '2'
09:24:48     INPUT "'"
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     INPUT "'42'\n"
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     NEW
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT "> '42'"
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[7G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> 21'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[5G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> 21'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[5G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     INPUT '21\n'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     NEW
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT "> 'you look fabulous today'"
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[28G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT "> 'you look fabulous today'"
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[28G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     NEW
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:48       'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:48       'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:48       'Persistent history support disabled. Set the NODE_REPL_HISTORY environment\n' +
09:24:48       'variable to a valid, user-writable path to enable.\n'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\r\n'
09:24:48     NEW
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[1G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[0J'
09:24:48     INPUT '> '
09:24:48     INPUT '\x1B[3G'
09:24:48     INPUT '\n' +
09:24:48       'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:48       'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n'
09:24:48     Failed test # 8
09:24:48     /home/IOJS/build/workspace/node-test-commit-ibmi/nodes/ibmi73-ppc64/test/parallel/test-repl-programmatic-history.js:231
09:24:48               throw err;
09:24:48               ^
09:24:48     
09:24:48     AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected values to be strictly equal:
09:24:48     + actual - expected
09:24:48     
09:24:48     + '\n' +
09:24:48     +   'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:48     +   'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n'
09:24:48     - undefined
09:24:48         at Writable.write [as _write] (/home/IOJS/build/workspace/node-test-commit-ibmi/nodes/ibmi73-ppc64/test/parallel/test-repl-programmatic-history.js:228:18)
09:24:48         at writeOrBuffer (node:internal/streams/writable:392:12)
09:24:48         at _write (node:internal/streams/writable:333:10)
09:24:48         at Writable.write (node:internal/streams/writable:337:10)
09:24:48         at [_writeToOutput] [as _writeToOutput] (node:internal/readline/interface:445:19)
09:24:48         at _writeToOutput (node:internal/repl/history:29:8)
09:24:48         at oninit (node:internal/repl/history:69:7)
09:24:48         at FSReqCallback.oncomplete (node:fs:201:23)
09:24:48         at FSReqCallback.callbackTrampoline (node:internal/async_hooks:130:17) {
09:24:48       generatedMessage: true,
09:24:48       code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
09:24:48       actual: '\n' +
09:24:48         'Error: Could not open history file.\n' +
09:24:48         'REPL session history will not be persisted.\n',
09:24:48       expected: undefined,
09:24:48       operator: 'strictEqual'
09:24:48     }
09:24:48     
09:24:48     Node.js v19.0.0-pre
09:24:48   ...

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

I logged into the machine and was able to see that, for some reason, one of the test fixtures was not owned by the iojs user running the tests:

bash-5.1$ ls -al /home/IOJS/build/workspace/node-test-commit-ibmi/nodes/ibmi73-ppc64/test/fixtures/
total 2608
drwxrwsrwx 51 iojs   0 126976 Jun 20 12:05 .
drwxrwsrwx 30 iojs   0  24576 Jun 29 08:32 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 nodejs 0      0 Jun 29 08:21 .empty-hidden-repl-history-file
-rw-rw-rw-  1 iojs   0      0 Jun  2 03:04 .empty-repl-history-file
-rw-rw-rw-  1 iojs   0     40 Jun  2 03:04 .node_repl_history
drwxrwsrwx  2 iojs   0   8192 Jun  2 03:04 0-dns

I'm not entirely sure how that has happened -- I've changed the owner of that file back to iojs and re-running: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/809/nodes=ibmi73-ppc64/

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

re-running: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/809/nodes=ibmi73-ppc64/

Good news is the repl test failures have gone away. Bad news is that this run has yet another failure 😢.

https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/809/nodes=ibmi73-ppc64/testReport/junit/(root)/test/parallel_test_http_pipeline_requests_connection_leak/

node:events:515
      throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
      ^

Error: read ECONNRESET
    at TCP.onStreamRead (node:internal/stream_base_commons:217:20)
Emitted 'error' event on Socket instance at:
    at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:151:8)
    at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:116:3)
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:82:21) {
  errno: -73,
  code: 'ECONNRESET',
  syscall: 'read'
}

Node.js v19.0.0-pre

Trying again: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/810/nodes=ibmi73-ppc64/

@V-for-Vasili
Copy link
Contributor

This error message looks like the one from ECONNRESET test failures a while back. Were PTFs MF69727 and MF69652
applied to this specific node (test-iinthecloud-ibmi73-ppc64_be-1) by Jesse?

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

This error message looks like the one from ECONNRESET test failures a while back. Were PTFs MF69727 and MF69652 applied to this specific node (test-iinthecloud-ibmi73-ppc64_be-1) by Jesse?

I have no idea. @ThePrez were the PTF's applied to the iinthecloud machines as well as the rzkh one?

@ThePrez
Copy link
Contributor

ThePrez commented Jun 29, 2022

Sorry, @richardlau et al.
Looks like the iinthecloud patch is still pending. The fix is only on the rzkh one. I contacted the system team and will update here when the fix is applied

targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 12, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`.

PR-URL: #43510
Refs: #42999
Refs: #43509
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 12, 2022
On IBM i rss memory information is not available and always returns `0`.

PR-URL: #43511
Refs: #43509
Refs: libuv/libuv#2732
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 20, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`.

PR-URL: #43510
Refs: #42999
Refs: #43509
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 20, 2022
On IBM i rss memory information is not available and always returns `0`.

PR-URL: #43511
Refs: #43509
Refs: libuv/libuv#2732
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`.

PR-URL: #43510
Refs: #42999
Refs: #43509
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2022
On IBM i rss memory information is not available and always returns `0`.

PR-URL: #43511
Refs: #43509
Refs: libuv/libuv#2732
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Aug 7, 2022

Still lots of IBM i CI failures. Here's today's daily run: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/849/nodes=ibmi73-ppc64/#showFailuresLink

It seems to be the difference between a red daily run and a yellow daily run. Should we consider removing IBM i from the daily run until things are in a better state? Or maybe moving it to its own daily run so it doesn't affect the daily results for overall?

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

@ThePrez Any news on APAR for the iinthecloud machines?

@ThePrez
Copy link
Contributor

ThePrez commented Aug 9, 2022

@richardlau unfortunately not. They have been unresponsive.
They did just get acquired (or maybe merged with) another company, so I am not sure if the email is broken, they are underwater with the merger, no longer have interest, or all of the above. Can we exclude them from the builds for now? The rzkh system should have the fixes

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

Still lots of IBM i CI failures. Here's today's daily run: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/849/nodes=ibmi73-ppc64/#showFailuresLink

There's only one failure there that isn't already marked flaky -- test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak. This was evaluated earlier in this issue (#43509 (comment)) as being related to a set of already marked flaky tests (#39683). There are OS PTFs (i.e. patches) available to fix the underlying issue but as noted we only have them on the rzkh IBM i CI machine and haven't yet been able to apply them to the iinthecloud machines (the Build WG are unable to do this).

I've opened a PR to mark test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak as flaky on IBM i: #44215
FTR I forced a CI run onto the rzkh machine which has thrown up a different, much smaller, set of failures: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/855/nodes=ibmi73-ppc64/
(the rzkh machine appears unreachable today so I haven't been able to repeat).

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 14, 2022
Mark `test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak` flaky on IBM i.

PR-URL: #44215
Refs: #43509
Refs: #39683
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

With #44215 we're down to one test that is failing the IBM i CI build:

https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/862/nodes=ibmi73-ppc64/console

10:21:56 not ok 3714 sequential/test-tls-psk-client # TODO : Fix flaky test
10:26:56   ---
10:26:56   duration_ms: 300.226
10:26:56   severity: fail
10:26:56   exitcode: -15
10:26:56   stack: |-
10:26:56     timeout
10:26:56     Failed: Timed out
10:26:56   ...

This test is already marked flaky on IBM i

# https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/39683
test-tls-psk-client: PASS, FLAKY
but it looks like the test runner treats timed out tests as failures (severity: fail) instead of flakes (severity: flaky).

danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2022
Mark `test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak` flaky on IBM i.

PR-URL: #44215
Refs: #43509
Refs: #39683
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
ruyadorno pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2022
Mark `test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak` flaky on IBM i.

PR-URL: #44215
Refs: #43509
Refs: #39683
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2022
Mark `test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak` flaky on IBM i.

PR-URL: #44215
Refs: #43509
Refs: #39683
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
Fyko pushed a commit to Fyko/node that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2022
Mark `test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak` flaky on IBM i.

PR-URL: nodejs#44215
Refs: nodejs#43509
Refs: nodejs#39683
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

I inadvertently introduced new failures with #44148 that are being addressed by #44810.

I've opened #44821 for the remaining issue.

guangwong pushed a commit to noslate-project/node that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#43510
Refs: nodejs/node#42999
Refs: nodejs/node#43509
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
guangwong pushed a commit to noslate-project/node that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2022
On IBM i rss memory information is not available and always returns `0`.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#43511
Refs: nodejs/node#43509
Refs: libuv/libuv#2732
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2022
Mark `test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak` flaky on IBM i.

PR-URL: #44215
Refs: #43509
Refs: #39683
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2022
Mark `test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak` flaky on IBM i.

PR-URL: #44215
Refs: #43509
Refs: #39683
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
guangwong pushed a commit to noslate-project/node that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2023
Mark `test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak` flaky on IBM i.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#44215
Refs: nodejs/node#43509
Refs: nodejs/node#39683
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
guangwong pushed a commit to noslate-project/node that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2023
Mark `test-http-pipeline-requests-connection-leak` flaky on IBM i.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#44215
Refs: nodejs/node#43509
Refs: nodejs/node#39683
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ibm i Issues and PRs related to the IBM i platform.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants