-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
parallel/test-fs-read-stream-concurrent-reads is flaky #51862
Comments
It's still very flaky: nodejs/reliability#835 |
Refs: nodejs#51862 Ran into this a few times myself this week and also seems to be a top failer in the reliability reports Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Refs: #51862 Ran into this a few times myself this week and also seems to be a top failer in the reliability reports Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #52671 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Refs: #51862 Ran into this a few times myself this week and also seems to be a top failer in the reliability reports Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #52671 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Refs: #51862 Ran into this a few times myself this week and also seems to be a top failer in the reliability reports Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #52671 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Refs: #51862 Ran into this a few times myself this week and also seems to be a top failer in the reliability reports Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #52671 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Refs: nodejs#51862 Ran into this a few times myself this week and also seems to be a top failer in the reliability reports Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: nodejs#52671 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Refs: nodejs#51862 Ran into this a few times myself this week and also seems to be a top failer in the reliability reports Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: nodejs#52671 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
@addaleax @gireeshpunathil ... do either of you remember why test-fs-read-stream-concurrent-reads.js was written to require 2000 streams? Based on the test it's not clear that so many iterations are required and the test is flaky. I'm think we either should reduce the number of iterations or maybe move the test to sequential --- I'm wondering if the concurrent reads and allocations may be causing the timeout errors. |
parallel/test-fs-read-stream-concurrent-reads
Example
Refs: nodejs/reliability#791
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: