-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
buffer: various performance improvements #12361
Conversation
PR-URL: nodejs#12361 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#12361 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#12361 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Landed in 46f2026...4749ec2 |
Not sure if it's too late to do anything, but I think this should have technically been Before: > Buffer.from('foo','ajdkl')
TypeError: "encoding" must be a valid string encoding
... After: > Buffer.from('foo','ajdkl')
TypeError: Unknown encoding: ajdkl
... The code that produces the first error message above is preserved, but it is moved to a location where it will never execute. Unfortunately, this wasn't caught by tests because the only test case we have for that error (in assert.throws(() => Buffer.from('', 'buffer'), TypeError); |
@Trott I think that can be easily fixed without affecting anything performance-wise. |
This should no longer be semver-major when landed with #12439. |
I'm dropping semver-major now that the regression fix has landed, in case we should want to land/backport these two PRs in other branches in the future ... |
PR-URL: #12361 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #12361 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #12361 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@mscdex should this be backported? If not please add the |
@MylesBorins It would probably need some benchmarking first to be sure it's still faster in previous V8 versions. |
Should land with #12439. |
I'm opting to not land this as we are getting close to maintenance if we change our mind we need to also include #14131 |
Various performance improvements for a few different
buffer
methods. Here are some results:I've decided not to mark this as semver-major despite changes such as
.toString()
now returning early whenbuf.length === 0
, in which case it won't validate the encoding name. The reason being there are already similar short-circuits being done in that method depending on the values ofstart
andend
.As far as I know there shouldn't be any other semver-major-like changes.
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/7352/
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)