-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
util: implement %o as formatting specifier #14558
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2dc1ba6
util: implement %o as formatting specifier
gla5001 c0826e7
util: implement %o as formatting specifier
gla5001 0b373b4
util: implement %o as formatting specifier.
gla5001 436765e
util: implement %o as formatting specifier. doc fix
gla5001 6bffe78
util: implement %o as formatting specifier
gla5001 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the default for
depth
? I think we shouldn't change its default.I'm okay with
showProxy
, but some people may interpret it as violating a security contract (where Proxies are supposed to be transparent)…There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
{depth: 2}
- https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/lib/util.js#L57There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So what was the rationale for using 4 instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even though I didn't originate it, IMHO it comes from
optimally useful formatting
and 2 is too small.Since we can't do interactive expansion like in a GUI, Ideally I'd say it needs to be
Infinity
, but that's unreasonable.This does make me think about a configurable
util.inspect.extendedFormattingOptions
or evenutil.format.optimallyUsefulFormatter
but that could happen in a later PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just for fun, I took a stroll down memory lane:
This is where is where
depth
was introduced a2714beTwo hour later the defaults were set de15214
Values seem to be a personal preferance https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nodejs/rAYFIeJ_72U/_bWLezvZavEJ
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about just using
null
?