-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
n-api: remove n-api module loading flag #14902
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW
Isn't this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a couple questions. If they prove to be nothing, then LGTM.
test/addons-napi/testcfg.py
Outdated
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ | |||
import testpy | |||
|
|||
def GetConfiguration(context, root): | |||
return testpy.AddonTestConfiguration(context, root, 'addons-napi', ['--napi-modules']) | |||
return testpy.AddonTestConfiguration(context, root, 'addons-napi', []) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The []
can be dropped too I think.
if (!node::load_napi_modules) { | ||
// NAPI is disabled, so set the module version to -1 to cause the module | ||
// to be unloaded. | ||
module_version = -1; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you remove this line, where is the value set to -1?
src/node.cc
Outdated
@@ -2537,27 +2534,20 @@ static void DLOpen(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) { | |||
env->ThrowError("Module did not self-register."); | |||
return; | |||
} | |||
if (mp->nm_version != NODE_MODULE_VERSION) { | |||
if (mp->nm_version == -1) { | |||
ProcessEmitWarning(env, "N-API is an experimental feature " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do any of our tests actually test for the warning?
src/node.cc
Outdated
@@ -3912,8 +3900,6 @@ static void ParseArgs(int* argc, | |||
force_repl = true; | |||
} else if (strcmp(arg, "--no-deprecation") == 0) { | |||
no_deprecation = true; | |||
} else if (strcmp(arg, "--napi-modules") == 0) { | |||
load_napi_modules = true; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe leave this in as a no-op for now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that would be a good idea. It will give us time to update docs etc and will avoid breaking people who are already using it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 to leaving it for now.
FYI @nodejs/ctc, @Fishrock123 to make people who were involved in earlier discussions comment/object in this PR if they still have issues with the approach. |
src/node.cc
Outdated
@@ -2537,27 +2534,20 @@ static void DLOpen(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) { | |||
env->ThrowError("Module did not self-register."); | |||
return; | |||
} | |||
if (mp->nm_version != NODE_MODULE_VERSION) { | |||
if (mp->nm_version == -1) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nitpick: Do we want this warning to be printed on every n-api module load or just the first one? Complicates the code slightly but might be a better experience if n-api becomes more common?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typically we emit warnings only on the first use.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer this list to be smashed before this getting in a release.
LGTM
513fe34
to
e6ad4b5
Compare
e6ad4b5
to
9b78363
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm ok with the changes but marking as "Request changes" so that we avoid landing until we have addressed this comment from @mcollina
I would prefer [this list](https://github.com/nodejs/abi-stable-node/issues/271) to be smashed before this getting in a release.
I think its reasonable that we either address or make the case why we don't need to in advance.
We plan to discuss the one related to CS modules with Bradley in our next regular N-API meeting (Thursday). @aruneshchandra since I think @jasongin is away can you chase down the status on the changes related to async hooks ?
@mhdawson the n-api team chatted with @RReverser and @bmeck last Thursday about ES6 module supprt- the discussion is captured at nodejs/abi-stable-node#256 (comment). TLDR is that n-api will not attempt to provide first class support for any module loader, but we will be making a breaking change (@BoingBoing has already opened #15088) |
Discussed in latest TSC/CTC meeting there did not seem to be objections to removing once we get through the list of breaking changes. Was left that if any TSC/CTC members object they should come and discuss in this PR. |
@mhdawson it seems like there are no objections anymore besides yours. I think think could land if you are good with it? |
@BridgeAR we are waiting until we have all of the remaining breaking changes in (we are close). We want those to land first as a group and then have this land as a second step. @gabrielschulhof is in the weekly meeting were we are discussing, so is in the loop as to the next steps. Once we are ready I'll go ahead and land this one. |
Looks like we are close to landing the remaining breaking changes, CI run: |
Now just waiting on #15108 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just about to land last breaking change so this one can go in as well.
@gabrielschulhof the tests no longer pass because of the changes to the Init signature. I'm done for today. Can you take a look and I'll try to land tomorrow. |
Remove the command line flag that was needed for N-API module loading. Re: nodejs/vm#9
9b78363
to
ca5d54f
Compare
Weird linter failure, so I stopped that and started https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10142/ instead. |
|
I'll leave it running because |
Remove the command line flag that was needed for N-API module loading. Re: nodejs/vm#9 PR-URL: nodejs/node#14902 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Hitesh Kanwathirtha <[email protected]>
Remove the command line flag that was needed for N-API module loading. Re: nodejs/vm#9 PR-URL: nodejs/node#14902 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Hitesh Kanwathirtha <[email protected]>
* **crypto** * Support for multiple ECDH curves. [#15206](#15206) * **dgram** * Added `setMulticastInterface()` API. [#7855](#7855) * **n-api** * The command-line flag is no longer required to use N-API. [#14902](#14902) * **tls** * Docs-only deprecation of `parseCertString()`. [#14245](#14245) * **New Contributors** * Welcome Sebastiaan Deckers (@sebdeckers) as a new Collaborator! [#15354](#15354)
* **crypto** * Support for multiple ECDH curves. [#15206](#15206) * **dgram** * Added `setMulticastInterface()` API. [#7855](#7855) * Custom lookup functions are now supported. [#14560](#14560) * **n-api** * The command-line flag is no longer required to use N-API. [#14902](#14902) * **tls** * Docs-only deprecation of `parseCertString()`. [#14245](#14245) * **New Contributors** * Welcome Sebastiaan Deckers (@sebdeckers) as a new Collaborator! [#15354](#15354)
* **crypto** * Support for multiple ECDH curves. [#15206](#15206) * **dgram** * Added `setMulticastInterface()` API. [#7855](#7855) * Custom lookup functions are now supported. [#14560](#14560) * **n-api** * The command-line flag is no longer required to use N-API. [#14902](#14902) * **tls** * Docs-only deprecation of `parseCertString()`. [#14245](#14245) * **New Contributors** * Welcome Sebastiaan Deckers (@sebdeckers) as a new Collaborator! [#15354](#15354)
* **crypto** * Support for multiple ECDH curves. [#15206](#15206) * **dgram** * Added `setMulticastInterface()` API. [#7855](#7855) * Custom lookup functions are now supported. [#14560](#14560) * **n-api** * The command-line flag is no longer required to use N-API. [#14902](#14902) * **tls** * Docs-only deprecation of `parseCertString()`. [#14245](#14245) * **New Contributors** * Welcome Sebastiaan Deckers (@sebdeckers) as a new Collaborator! [#15354](#15354)
* **crypto** * Support for multiple ECDH curves. [#15206](nodejs/node#15206) * **dgram** * Added `setMulticastInterface()` API. [#7855](nodejs/node#7855) * Custom lookup functions are now supported. [#14560](nodejs/node#14560) * **n-api** * The command-line flag is no longer required to use N-API. [#14902](nodejs/node#14902) * **tls** * Docs-only deprecation of `parseCertString()`. [#14245](nodejs/node#14245) * **New Contributors** * Welcome Sebastiaan Deckers (@sebdeckers) as a new Collaborator! [#15354](nodejs/node#15354)
Remove the command line flag that was needed for N-API module loading. Re: nodejs/vm#9 PR-URL: nodejs#14902 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Hitesh Kanwathirtha <[email protected]>
Remove the command line flag that was needed for N-API module loading. Re: nodejs/vm#9 Backport-PR-URL: #19447 PR-URL: #14902 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Hitesh Kanwathirtha <[email protected]>
Remove the command line flag that was needed for N-API module loading.
Re: nodejs/vm#9
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
n-api