-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src: make FSEventWrap/StatWatcher::Start more robust #17432
Conversation
src/fs_event_wrap.cc
Outdated
CHECK_EQ(wrap->initialized_, false); | ||
if (wrap->initialized_) { | ||
args.GetReturnValue().Set(0); | ||
return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For consistency with the surrounding code, maybe write this as return args.GetReturnValue().Set(0);
without braces.
test/parallel/test-fs-watch.js
Outdated
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ for (const testCase of cases) { | |||
assert.strictEqual(eventType, 'change'); | |||
assert.strictEqual(argFilename, testCase.fileName); | |||
|
|||
watcher.start(); // should not crash |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't the linter complain about using two spaces before //
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No it doesn't, though fixed anyway.
src/node_stat_watcher.cc
Outdated
@@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ void StatWatcher::Start(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) { | |||
const bool persistent = args[1]->BooleanValue(); | |||
const uint32_t interval = args[2]->Uint32Value(); | |||
|
|||
if (uv_is_active(reinterpret_cast<uv_handle_t*>(wrap->watcher_))) | |||
return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is wrong when Start() is called with different arguments than last time. This should work:
uv_fs_poll_stop(wrap->watcher_);
uv_fs_poll_start(wrap->watcher_, Callback, *path, interval);
// Safe, uv_ref/uv_unref are idempotent.
if (persistent)
uv_ref(reinterpret_cast<uv_handle_t*>(wrap->watcher_));
else
uv_unref(reinterpret_cast<uv_handle_t*>(wrap->watcher_));
And while we're here, this code really ought to check the return value of uv_fs_poll_start()
(and uv_fs_poll_stop()
too, although it can't fail in the current implementation.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Start() is not part of the external API, and no guarantees were made whether it works with different arguments or not. On the other hand, the proposed solution breaks compatibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then why don't you make it throw an exception? Methods should not silently do the wrong thing, that's arguably worse than aborting.
On the other hand, the proposed solution breaks compatibility.
In what way?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The added test currently throws no exception. If I make it throw an exception it would be breaking compatibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you mean? There are no compatibility issues because it was aborting before.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was aborting in FSEventWrap, not StatWatcher. This was simply tacked on as a similar change that improves the current behavior in a similar way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wouldn't use the word 'improves'. StatWatcher already worked mostly like I proposed in my first comment and that would be an acceptable change for FSEventWrap too, as would throwing an exception. Silently ignoring changes is the worst possible solution however.
924f5f6
to
b4fd89e
Compare
PR-URL: nodejs#17432 Fixes: nodejs#17430 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Landed in cd71fc1 |
#17432 (comment) is still unfixed. |
PR-URL: #17432 Fixes: #17430 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
should this be backported to v6.x or 8.x... my gut is no but not 100% |
ping re: backport |
ping re: backport edit: landed cleanly on 8.x. Any reason not to land? |
PR-URL: #17432 Fixes: #17430 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins No, not really. |
PR-URL: #17432 Fixes: #17430 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #17432 Fixes: #17430 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Fixes: #17430
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
fs, src