Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
async_hooks: use typed array stack as fast path #17780
async_hooks: use typed array stack as fast path #17780
Changes from all commits
d84f16e
6bed72a
12c10d1
24c80e7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd take a slightly different approach here. Growing the stack can be done in JS: allocate a new typed array, copy over the elements, then call into C++ to update the AliasedBuffer's reference. That probably also obviates the need to overload
operator=(AliasedBuffer&&)
.If you wrote it this way because of how PromiseHook() calls
env->async_hooks()->push_async_ids()
, perhaps you can work around that by ensuring there are always a few free slots? I think that should work although admittedly I didn't look too closely.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bnoordhuis It’s not just
PromiseHook()
,MakeCallback()
also does that – I think for your suggestion to work in a generic fashion you’d have to call that growing function from C++, which kind of just moves the problem around