-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: update threat model based on discussions #46373
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@RafaelGSS, @mcollina, @jasnell how does this look to you? |
7235f14
to
54159df
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
* If Node.js is asked to connect to a remote site and return an | ||
artifact, it is not considered a vulnerability if the size of | ||
that artifact is large enough to impact performance and or | ||
cause the runtime to run out of resources. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this actually true? Say I host a malicious server that triggers a hash table collision denial-of-service in node's http client - that's considered a vulnerability, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bnoordhuis I think your example is different in that it does not relate to the size of the artifact returned.
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #46373 Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
Landed in 088e470 |
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #46373 Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #46373 Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson [email protected]