async_hooks: add async local storage propagation benchmarks #46414
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
async_hooks
legendecas
force-pushed
the
async_hooks/als_benchmark
branch
from
4881769 to
fa59ad3
Compare
jasnell
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2023
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Flarna
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2023
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
JungMinu
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2023
Add micro-benchmarks to verify the performance degradation related to the number of active `AsyncLocalStorage`s. With these benchmarks, trying to improve the async context propagation to be an O(1) operation, which is an operation more frequent compared to `asyncLocalStorage.run` and `asyncLocalStorage.getStore`.
legendecas
force-pushed
the
async_hooks/als_benchmark
branch
from
fa59ad3 to
22c8683
Compare
|
Style fix after #46424 landed. |
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Flarna
approved these changes
Feb 3, 2023
Flarna
added
the
commit-queue
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
|
Landed in 3000d77 |
This was referenced Feb 5, 2023
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2023
Add micro-benchmarks to verify the performance degradation related to the number of active `AsyncLocalStorage`s. With these benchmarks, trying to improve the async context propagation to be an O(1) operation, which is an operation more frequent compared to `asyncLocalStorage.run` and `asyncLocalStorage.getStore`. PR-URL: #46414 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Merged
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
Add micro-benchmarks to verify the performance degradation related to the number of active `AsyncLocalStorage`s. With these benchmarks, trying to improve the async context propagation to be an O(1) operation, which is an operation more frequent compared to `asyncLocalStorage.run` and `asyncLocalStorage.getStore`. PR-URL: #46414 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add micro-benchmarks to verify the performance degradation related to
the number of active
AsyncLocalStorages.With these benchmarks, trying to improve the async context propagation
to be an O(1) operation, which is an operation more frequent compared
to
asyncLocalStorage.runandasyncLocalStorage.getStore.