Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): Test out new Brillig execution report #6397

Closed
wants to merge 14 commits into from

Conversation

vezenovm
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Problem*

Resolves

Summary*

Additional Context

Documentation*

Check one:

  • No documentation needed.
  • Documentation included in this PR.
  • [For Experimental Features] Documentation to be submitted in a separate PR.

PR Checklist*

  • I have tested the changes locally.
  • I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt on default settings.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Changes to Brillig bytecode sizes

Generated at commit: c2698d302754f995f6e070886200e4bab0ffc896, compared to commit: 46f2215c6af8522bc876fd6259e0cf0055063f0f

🧾 Summary (10% most significant diffs)

Program Brillig opcodes (+/-) %
sha256_regression -1,218 ✅ -16.44%

Full diff report 👇
Program Brillig opcodes (+/-) %
sha256_regression 6,193 (-1,218) -16.44%

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Changes to circuit sizes

Generated at commit: c2698d302754f995f6e070886200e4bab0ffc896, compared to commit: 46f2215c6af8522bc876fd6259e0cf0055063f0f

🧾 Summary (10% most significant diffs)

Program ACIR opcodes (+/-) % Circuit size (+/-) %
sha256_regression -6,721 ✅ -19.15% -33,005 ✅ -16.71%

Full diff report 👇
Program ACIR opcodes (+/-) % Circuit size (+/-) %
sha256_regression 28,369 (-6,721) -19.15% 164,455 (-33,005) -16.71%

Copy link
Contributor

Changes to number of Brillig opcodes executed

Generated at commit: c2698d302754f995f6e070886200e4bab0ffc896, compared to commit: fde620f083291aa3acebcd43ed58893f62141c71

🧾 Summary (10% most significant diffs)

Program Brillig opcodes (+/-) %
sha256_var_size_regression -1,008 ✅ -5.49%
sha256_var_padding_regression -14,112 ✅ -6.01%
sha256_regression -28,708 ✅ -22.72%

Full diff report 👇
Program Brillig opcodes (+/-) %
6 320,031 (-84) -0.03%
sha2_byte 47,182 (-21) -0.04%
array_dynamic_nested_blackbox_input 4,487 (-21) -0.47%
brillig_sha256 4,188 (-21) -0.50%
sha256 10,795 (-63) -0.58%
sha256_var_witness_const_regression 6,999 (-42) -0.60%
conditional_1 5,803 (-42) -0.72%
conditional_regression_short_circuit 7,366 (-84) -1.13%
regression_4449 216,962 (-2,940) -1.34%
ecdsa_secp256k1 6,874 (-210) -2.96%
array_dynamic_blackbox_input 18,714 (-672) -3.47%
brillig_cow_regression 555,717 (-28,056) -4.81%
ram_blowup_regression 834,654 (-43,008) -4.90%
sha256_var_size_regression 17,346 (-1,008) -5.49%
sha256_var_padding_regression 220,829 (-14,112) -6.01%
sha256_regression 97,645 (-28,708) -22.72%

Base automatically changed from mv/brillig-execution-report to master October 30, 2024 22:28
@vezenovm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing now that #6396 is in

@vezenovm vezenovm closed this Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant