Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the HTTP endpoint for Notary Signer #870

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2016

Conversation

cyli
Copy link
Contributor

@cyli cyli commented Jul 23, 2016

Since its' not used by anything. The signer is generally kept hidden in notary service deployments anyway, and the GRPC interface is the main supported interface.
cc @NathanMcCauley

I also wanted to check if anyone was doing anything with the HTTP interface first, though. @andrewhsu @ecordell @HuKeping @mtrmac?

@cyli cyli force-pushed the remove-signer-http-interface branch from e2bf987 to a487935 Compare July 23, 2016 01:57
@HuKeping
Copy link
Contributor

HuKeping commented Jul 23, 2016

👍

Thanks for the ping. It's great to see this

…ing.

This removes the maintenance burden of keeping them in sync.

Signed-off-by: Ying Li <[email protected]>
@cyli cyli force-pushed the remove-signer-http-interface branch from a487935 to 5d6bd65 Compare July 23, 2016 08:17
localhost only. That means that the server will not be
accessible except locally (via SSH tunnel, or just on a local
terminal)</li>
</ul>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you for updating docs too! 👍

@riyazdf
Copy link
Contributor

riyazdf commented Jul 25, 2016

this is awesome, LGTM

@endophage
Copy link
Contributor

All the LGTMs!

@endophage endophage merged commit a65a0cc into notaryproject:master Jul 25, 2016
@cyli cyli deleted the remove-signer-http-interface branch July 25, 2016 21:07
@SvenDowideit
Copy link
Contributor

@endophage is this for v0.4.0?

@endophage
Copy link
Contributor

@SvenDowideit given it has been merged, yes it will be included in 0.4.0. Note it's only the signer that is losing plain HTTP endpoints, and nobody but the server was talking to the signer (and the server was only using GRPC).

@SvenDowideit SvenDowideit added this to the Notary 0.4 milestone Aug 9, 2016
@SvenDowideit
Copy link
Contributor

cool - the docs tooling uses the milestone to determine if a PR should be published, so I've added 0.4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants