Bug fix: Tree find() didn't look for files deeper than two levels #12
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The split() function basically truncated everything after two levels. What we needed to do was to get the head and rest of the path components.
I suppose I could use unshift() here, since doing .join() would be O(n) anyway. Let me know if you think that'd be cleaner to do.
Also, I did write tests for it, but I wasn't able to update the test fixtures appropriately to reflect a deeper dir hierarchy. So while the tests pass, none of the test fixtures have something 3 layers deep. Should I add another one?