This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 11, 2021. It is now read-only.
Add Power Support ppc64le #38
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Lockfile is using org instead of com as per below, please convert to travis-ci.com as org is getting deprecated in few weeks. I have used com and the jobs ran good as per below. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added power support for the travis.yml file with ppc64le. This is part of the Ubuntu distribution for ppc64le. This helps us simplify testing later when distributions are re-building and re-releasing.
we took these projects as already being part of the ppc64le distros from debian/ubuntu. So this doesn't represent a specific user or use case, but the simple fact that this is viewed as a base/common package for Linux at this point and we enable all of these packages for Power. Our goal is to hit full parity with Intel in terms of application availability. we can't name a specific lockfile user, but usually ubuntu includes packages like this because they believe that they are the future or at least modern software and we piggy back on that decision. I know that's probably not an insightful "who are my users" answer that you are looking for but that's how we got here.