Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the reverse setter #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2023
Merged

Remove the reverse setter #22

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2023

Conversation

maxhelias
Copy link
Member

We already set the target entity, so we don't need to re set the collection on the inverse relationship.
This way, we avoid deadlocks in parallel execution during index generation

Copy link

Coverage Report

Totals Coverage
Statements: 74.73% ( 476 / 637 )
Methods: 63.64% ( 42 / 66 )
Lines: 76.01% ( 434 / 571 )

StandWithUkraine

@maxhelias maxhelias merged commit d8e00ea into master Nov 16, 2023
@maxhelias maxhelias deleted the remove-inversed-set branch November 16, 2023 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants