Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add event proto #387

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 22, 2023
Merged

Add event proto #387

merged 5 commits into from
Jun 22, 2023

Conversation

alexmasi
Copy link
Contributor

This will be used in anonymous usage reporting

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 16, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 5340073208

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 66.061%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 5339973231: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 3673
Relevant Lines: 5560

💛 - Coveralls

@alexmasi
Copy link
Contributor Author

/gcbrun

Copy link
Collaborator

@bormanp bormanp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there should be a comment that says identifying information must not be added to these structures (which is why link_count is included but the list of links is not).

proto/event.proto Show resolved Hide resolved
message Node {
topo.Vendor vendor = 1;
string model = 2;
string version = 3;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How important are version and os? Wouldn't these be determinable from the vendor/model? There probably should be a comment justifying each piece of information gathered.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added comments. Version and OS provide much less value than knowing the vendor+model so I've removed them.

@alexmasi alexmasi requested a review from bormanp June 22, 2023 00:02
@alexmasi
Copy link
Contributor Author

/gcbrun

@alexmasi alexmasi merged commit 68c2b78 into main Jun 22, 2023
@alexmasi alexmasi deleted the events branch June 22, 2023 00:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants