-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add event proto #387
Add event proto #387
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 5340073208
💛 - Coveralls |
/gcbrun |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there should be a comment that says identifying information must not be added to these structures (which is why link_count is included but the list of links is not).
proto/event.proto
Outdated
message Node { | ||
topo.Vendor vendor = 1; | ||
string model = 2; | ||
string version = 3; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How important are version and os? Wouldn't these be determinable from the vendor/model? There probably should be a comment justifying each piece of information gathered.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added comments. Version and OS provide much less value than knowing the vendor+model so I've removed them.
/gcbrun |
This will be used in anonymous usage reporting