Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: transifex migration to new client #206

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2022

Conversation

edx-requirements-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@edx-requirements-bot edx-requirements-bot commented Mar 17, 2022

Description

  • Updated transifex client config for new transifex client.

@edx-requirements-bot edx-requirements-bot requested review from UsamaSadiq and a team March 17, 2022 12:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 17, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #206 (91b8636) into master (3f3d832) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #206   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           12        12           
  Lines          412       412           
  Branches        64        64           
=========================================
  Hits           412       412           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3f3d832...91b8636. Read the comment docs.

@UsamaSadiq UsamaSadiq marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2022 10:59
@UsamaSadiq UsamaSadiq merged commit b390ade into master Apr 6, 2022
@UsamaSadiq UsamaSadiq deleted the jenkins/transifex-client-migration-3f3d832 branch April 6, 2022 07:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants