Make inscriptions module pub

[raphjaph]

Made the inscriptions module and some structs pub. Did it in a pretty haphazard way and would love feedback if I should use pub use in src/inscriptions.rs so that there is less indirection (less submodules to include in the import statements). Basically any feedback on good crate/library design.

Let me know if this is useful to you guys @rot13maxi @JeremyRubin

[JeremyRubin]

I think you should split out things into a couple different crates -- inscription for example should be really "tiny" to make it includable in Miniscript as an optional dep.

[raphjaph]

Ok thanks for the feedback! I think splitting out into crates makes sense but probably a bit too much work for the next release.

Possible sub crates:

• ordinals/sats
• inscriptions
• runes
• wallet
• ord (binary crate)

[casey]

What functionality would a crate need to expose for use in miniscript in order to be useful?

[JeremyRubin]

i doubt mainline miniscript will

1. take a non-rust-bitcoin-owned dep
2. add inscriptions to the spec, as I've done in Sapio

That said, were you to get buy in, the functionality is basically just what's in the inscription module, which is pretty minimal.

[raphjaph]

I'm going to close this since we are working on #3079 and #1249.