Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Gravity Externals #918

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2022
Merged

Add Gravity Externals #918

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2022

Conversation

JohnnyWyles
Copy link
Contributor

As per Proposal 347 https://www.mintscan.io/osmosis/proposals/347 Will go live Epoch of 24th October.

As per Proposal 347 https://www.mintscan.io/osmosis/proposals/347
Will go live Epoch of 24th October.
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 23, 2022

@JohnnyWyles is attempting to deploy a commit to the OsmoLabs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JeremyParish69 JeremyParish69 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The gauges are correct.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JeremyParish69 JeremyParish69 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are already objects for 633 and 625, so those should be modified rather than creating new ones. In addition, would be nice to keep pool numbers in order

@JohnnyWyles
Copy link
Contributor Author

There are already objects for 633 and 625, so those should be modified rather than creating new ones. In addition, would be nice to keep pool numbers in order

Didn't realise they had previous incentives sorry, replaced these objects.
Was also going by Gauge order, will do pool order in future

@jonator jonator merged commit 9f249ca into osmosis-labs:master Oct 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants