Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix mc_dump CLI command for SimplePre type #343

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2017
Merged

Conversation

antoninbas
Copy link
Member

The command implementation was correct for SimplePreLAG but not for
SimplePre, as it assumed the existence of LAG entries in the JSON
returned by the switch.

This addresses issue #342.

The command implementation was correct for SimplePreLAG but not for
SimplePre, as it assumed the existence of LAG entries in the JSON
returned by the switch.

This addresses issue #342.
@antoninbas antoninbas merged commit ab832df into master Apr 27, 2017
antoninbas added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2017
The command implementation was correct for SimplePreLAG but not for
SimplePre, as it assumed the existence of LAG entries in the JSON
returned by the switch.

This addresses issue #342.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 27, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #343 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #343   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.44%   76.44%           
=======================================
  Files         108      108           
  Lines        8607     8607           
=======================================
  Hits         6580     6580           
  Misses       2027     2027

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 593026c...c851f36. Read the comment docs.

@antoninbas antoninbas deleted the CLI-mc-dump-fix branch April 27, 2017 17:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants