We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell
Codespell does not check against a dictionary, so niche terms don't trigger false-positives. Could actually alleviate the need for skip/ignore option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think codespell could be used as an option, such as a "strictness" level
For example strict=low would use codespell, while strict=high would use dictionaries. I personally prefer the dictionary-based implementation.
strict=low
strict=high
Sorry, something went wrong.
I see, thanks for your feedback :) I do think it would be nice to have multiple spellcheck backends that users can enable/disable at wish.
feat: Add codespell backend
codespell
bc8e84c
Issue #11: #11
No branches or pull requests
https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell
Codespell does not check against a dictionary, so niche terms don't trigger false-positives. Could actually alleviate the need for skip/ignore option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: