Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Try with codespell instead #11

Closed
pawamoy opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Try with codespell instead #11

pawamoy opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@pawamoy
Copy link
Owner

pawamoy commented Feb 17, 2022

https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell

Codespell does not check against a dictionary, so niche terms don't trigger false-positives. Could actually alleviate the need for skip/ignore option.

@Archmonger
Copy link

I think codespell could be used as an option, such as a "strictness" level

For example strict=low would use codespell, while strict=high would use dictionaries. I personally prefer the dictionary-based implementation.

@pawamoy
Copy link
Owner Author

pawamoy commented Nov 2, 2022

I see, thanks for your feedback :)
I do think it would be nice to have multiple spellcheck backends that users can enable/disable at wish.

pawamoy added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2022
@pawamoy pawamoy closed this as completed Mar 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants