A Julia package for piping a value through a series of transformation expressions using a more convenient syntax than Julia's native piping functionality.
Chain.jl | Base Julia |
---|---|
@chain df begin
dropmissing
filter(:id => >(6), _)
groupby(:group)
combine(:age => sum)
end |
df |>
dropmissing |>
x -> filter(:id => >(6), x) |>
x -> groupby(x, :group) |>
x -> combine(x, :age => sum) |
Pipe.jl | Lazy.jl |
@pipe df |>
dropmissing |>
filter(:id => >(6), _)|>
groupby(_, :group) |>
combine(_, :age => sum) |
@> df begin
dropmissing
x -> filter(:id => >(6), x)
groupby(:group)
combine(:age => sum)
end |
Chain.jl defines the @chain
macro. It takes a start value and a begin ... end
block of expressions.
The result of each expression is fed into the next one using one of two rules:
- There is at least one underscore in the expression
- every
_
is replaced with the result of the previous expression
- There is no underscore
- the result of the previous expression is used as the first argument in the current expression, as long as it is a function call, a macro call or a symbol representing a function.
Lines that are prefaced with @aside
are executed, but their result is not fed into the next pipeline step.
This is very useful to inspect pipeline state during debugging, for example.
- The implicit first argument insertion is useful for many data pipeline scenarios, like
groupby
,transform
andcombine
in DataFrames.jl - The
_
syntax is there to either increase legibility or to use functions likefilter
ormap
which need the previous result as the second argument - There is no need to type
|>
over and over - Any line can be commented out or in without breaking syntax, there is no problem with dangling
|>
symbols - The state of the pipeline can easily be checked with the
@aside
macro - The
begin ... end
block marks very clearly where the macro is applied and works well with auto-indentation - Because everything is just lines with separate expressions and not one huge function call, IDEs can show exactly in which line errors happened
- Pipe is a name defined by Base Julia which can lead to conflicts
An example with a DataFrame:
using DataFrames, Chain
df = DataFrame(group = [1, 2, 1, 2, missing], weight = [1, 3, 5, 7, missing])
result = @chain df begin
dropmissing
filter(r -> r.weight < 6, _)
groupby(:group)
combine(:weight => sum => :total_weight)
end
The pipeless block is equivalent to this:
result = let
var1 = dropmissing(df)
var2 = filter(r -> r.weight < 6, var1)
var3 = groupby(var2, :group)
var4 = combine(var3, :weight => sum => :total_weight)
end
If your initial argument name is long and / or the chain's result is assigned to a long variable, it can look cleaner if the initial value is moved into the chain. Here is such a long expression:
a_long_result_variable_name = @chain a_long_input_variable_name begin
do_something
do_something_else(parameter)
do_other_thing(parameter, _)
end
This is equivalent to the following expression:
a_long_result_variable_name = @chain begin
a_long_input_variable_name
do_something
do_something_else(parameter)
do_other_thing(parameter, _)
end
For debugging, it's often useful to look at values in the middle of a pipeline.
You can use the @aside
macro to mark expressions that should not pass on their result.
For these expressions there is no implicit first argument spliced in if there is no _
, because that would be impractical for most purposes.
If for example, we wanted to know how many groups were created after step 3, we could do this:
result = @chain df begin
dropmissing
filter(r -> r.weight < 6, _)
groupby(:group)
@aside println("There are $(length(_)) groups after step 3.")
combine(:weight => sum => :total_weight)
end
Which is again equivalent to this:
result = let
var1 = dropmissing(df)
var2 = filter(r -> r.weight < 6, var1)
var3 = groupby(var2, :group)
println("There are $(length(var3)) groups after step 3.")
var4 = combine(var3, :weight => sum => :total_weight)
end
The @chain
macro replaces all underscores in the following block, unless it encounters another @chain
macrocall.
In that case, the only underscore that is still replaced by the outer macro is the first argument of the inner @chain
.
You can use this, for example, in combination with the @aside
macro if you need to process a side result further.
@chain df begin
dropmissing
filter(r -> r.weight < 6, _)
@aside @chain _ begin
select(:group)
CSV.write("filtered_groups.csv", _)
end
groupby(:group)
combine(:weight => sum => :total_weight)
end
Here is a list of equivalent expressions, where _
is replaced by prev
and the new variable is next
.
In reality, each new variable simply gets a new name via gensym
, which is guaranteed not to conflict with anything else.
Before | After | Comment |
---|---|---|
sum |
next = sum(prev) |
Symbol gets expanded into function call |
sum() |
next = sum(prev) |
First argument is inserted |
sum(_) |
next = sum(prev) |
Call expression gets _ replaced |
_ + 3 |
next = prev + 3 |
Infix call expressions work the same way as other calls |
+(3) |
next = prev + 3 |
Infix notation with _ would look better, but this is also possible |
1 + 2 |
next = prev + 1 + 2 |
This might feel weird, but 1 + 2 is a normal call expression |
filter(isodd, _) |
next = filter(isodd, prev) |
Underscore can go anywhere |
@aside println(_) |
println(prev) |
println without affecting the pipeline; using _ |
@aside println("hello") |
println("hello") |
println without affecting the pipeline; no implicit first arg |
@. sin |
next = sin.(prev) |
Special-cased alternative to sin.() |
sin.() |
next = sin.(prev) |
First argument is prepended for broadcast calls as well |
somefunc.(x) |
next = somefunc.(prev, x) |
First argument is prepended for broadcast calls as well |
@somemacro |
next = @somemacro(prev) |
Macro calls without arguments get an argument spliced in |
@somemacro(x) |
next = @somemacro(prev, x) |
First argument splicing is the same as with functions |
@somemacro(x, _) |
next = @somemacro(x, prev) |
Also underscore behavior |