-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Additional (simple) way to compute Evapotransporation #34
Comments
Steps to do
|
philippkraft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 20, 2019
philippkraft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 20, 2019
philippkraft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 20, 2019
philippkraft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2019
philippkraft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2019
…f Weather" This reverts commit abb6924
philippkraft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2019
…f Weather" This reverts partly commit abb6924
philippkraft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2019
philippkraft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2019
philippkraft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Oudin et al (2005, Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped
rainfall–runoff model?) developed an simple PET calculation method. This seems to be working very good for lumped conceptual models and also needs little forcing data (Mean Temperature and Radiation).
Might be worth including.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: