Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Install MathJax using npm and bump version from 2.3 to 2.7.5 #5494

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 18, 2021

Conversation

archmoj
Copy link
Contributor

@archmoj archmoj commented Feb 11, 2021

Resolves #5452.
cc: #5395

TODO:

  • fix for baselines

@plotly/plotly_js

@archmoj archmoj added this to the NEXT milestone Feb 11, 2021
@archmoj archmoj changed the title Install MathJax using npm and bump version from 2.3 to 2.7.9 Install MathJax using npm and bump version from 2.3 to 2.7.5 Feb 16, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexcjohnson alexcjohnson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💃 Looks good. The fonts are a bit wonky in the orca images, but on the flip side it gets text alignment correct in the table mocks, which the other version doesn't. Anyway, this should be fine until we find the time to convert to Kaleido.

@archmoj archmoj merged commit cfa7720 into master Feb 18, 2021
@archmoj archmoj deleted the mathjax-v2.7.9 branch February 18, 2021 01:41
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
"karma-viewport": "^1.0.7",
"lodash": "^4.17.20",
"madge": "^3.12.0",
"mathjax": "2.7.9",
"mathjax": "2.7.5",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reason why we stick to 2.7.5 for now.
@nicolaskruchten commented on slack:

Let's target 2.7.5 for MathJax for now
this is what JupyterLab 2.x uses
so it's a good floor IMO
JupyterLab 3.x is on 2.7.9

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature something new
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Investigate upgrading mathjax in v2
3 participants